{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Eliminate Baldrige Award and Save $120M?

Bipartisan committee eyes the national quality program as part of cost-cutting measure

Raissa Carey
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 16:01
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (NCFRR), a bipartisan committee created by President Obama to address the country’s fiscal challenges, recently released its recommendations to reduce the nation’s debt. If put into practice, the measures are expected to make $200 billion in savings by 2015. Among the 58 recommendations, the NCFRR wants to “eliminate the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (HMEP) and the Baldrige National Quality Program (now Baldrige Performance Excellence Program),” which would save more than $120 million annually, according to the committee.

ADVERTISEMENT

The news came as a shock to the quality community, and organizations such as the American Society for Quality (ASQ) and the California Council for Excellence (CCE) have stepped in to campaign against the program’s elimination.

The NCFRR argues that the private sector already provides similar programs and that companies should strive to maintain quality of their products without awards from the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program. In addition, the committee states that “some funding from HMEP supports inefficient companies that would otherwise go out of business.”

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by jackdearing on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 10:44

Saving the Baldrige Award

There is going to be pain as the govenment starts to take back benefits that it cannot afford to have offered in the first place.

I think the Baldrige Award has value. Perhaps most of that value can be saved if NIST and ASQ ask for half a loaf rather than ending up with none. Or, if the program has as much value as its supporters contend, then they should show the cost-benefit analysis--with hard numbers on both sides of the balance--to the NCFRR.

Jack Dearing

  • Reply

Submitted by jimcarrollcrna on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 12:20

It's a good program, so the government needs to fund it.

Right.

If it is a good program, and if it can be done well by NIST, it ought to be capable of being done as well or better, and certainly cheaper, by the private sector.

If it is not a good program, and if it doesn't produce benefits that mitigate its cost, then it ought to be scrapped.

  • Reply

Submitted by Archie the Gopher on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 12:24

Baldrige National Quality Program & HMEP

Archie the Gopher - - Serving Education Delivering Quality

Recapturing economic opportunities & business is a primary role, & opportunity, of small businesses. Both programs are important as both how-to & support-for emerging & existing businesses.

The current budgets may need adjusting, a role for ASQ in "management" might work, & the taxing of "tax exempt" businesses may be required. For exaqmple, some university "businesses" offer everything from consulting services, sale of computer services & products, hotel services, etc., & they operate tax exempt. They may be in the same market competing for the same dollars as private, for profit, tax paying businesses.

Politics - - interesting issues as we consider economic opportunities, quality, & confirmed results.

Jerry Brong - - For Archie the Gopher

  • Reply

Submitted by Grace Duffy on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 13:14

Terminating the Baldrige is short term thinking

While I applaud the NCFRR goal of reducing unnecessary spending at the Federal level, I am disappointed to see a short term focus by eliminating the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program. The Baldrige is the base for excellence programs at the international level. The long term benefits of the organizational models within the Baldrige have already been shown within publicly held organizations and now, with the inclusion of not for profit, small business and government organizations, the whole interconnected system of business at the global level.

The NCFRR mentions that there are private award programs that can take the place of the Baldrige. Actually, the state programs are based on the Dept. of Commerce/NIST guidelines and the most recognized best practice model is the Baldrige.

Reduction in waste and duplication within business is a goal of the Baldrige. The vehicle for improved performance within the business community has been the Baldrige for 23 years. True, use of the model has varied through the years. The economy certainly has influence on how many organizations take advantage of the opportunity. I agree with Dr. Spong (Retired, Boeing) that the skills transferred to examiners provides long term commitment to performance excellence as a cultural thread within the US. The long term impact of terminating the program will be a net loss to the productivity and overall economic well being of the US.

  • Reply

Submitted by Venkatramani on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 21:33

Elimination of Baldrige Award

This message will be viewed differently by many organisations based on the maturity of the organization.
Type-1: Many of the Cost conscience Managements/Owners who are in to the business without understanding the real meaning and intent of Quality will straight away jump in to the P(Prevention) & A(Appraisal) Cost Cutting of the Quality function quoting this message as an example and finally land in to the F(Failure) cost which is many times more than the P & A and quickly dig the grave yard ready for the organization's future.
Type-2: Definitely the matured Management/Owners who know the very purpose of the Quality importance will behave indifferent for this message as they know very well this message will increase their opportunity in the market by killing the competition who are the above said type-1 category !
If we see the history of many quality Gurus, then we will understand that these phases have been already faced by those Great Gurus.
Let us do our quality job effectively with more rigour so that no body will give weightage to such messages !
With Regards,
Venkat

  • Reply

Submitted by bahadir on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 22:24

Elimination of Baldrige Award

That thinking is a sure sign of the necessity of an orientation program for US presidents. Such awareness program should include the fundamentals of total quality management, Deming's 14 points, quality costs and so on.

  • Reply

Submitted by Wayne Ferch on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 11:15

Save the Baldrige Award Program!

I agree with the need to save money at the federal level by eliminating programs that are no longer useful. However, the Baldrige program is not one of those programs. The Baldridge program has been used by countless organizations to improve processes and results, to develop leaders and to spread innovation accross different business sectors. If anything this is a program that deserves more funding to expand its reach. This program has had a profound positive impact on my hospital though learning from national best practice organizations as well as the leadership development that occurs through use of the criteria.

  • Reply

Submitted by JPW Associates on Tue, 12/07/2010 - 14:53

Cut one F35-B from the DOD budget and found Baldrige for a year!

Cost estimates for just ONE of these jets is about $200 million - what will bring more value to the USA?

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us