Hyperscan. Image Credit: Hexagon
Ask anyone who’s bought a handheld 3D scanner with optical tracking system in the last few years about what sold them, and you’ll hear about speed. More points per second. Larger scanning areas. Faster data capture.
|
ADVERTISEMENT |
Those improvements matter. But when you look at the entire inspection process, from the moment a part arrives for measurement to the moment a report is delivered, the scanner itself is often no longer the bottleneck.
The bottleneck is everything that happens around the scan.
It’s establishing alignments before measurement can begin. It’s switching to a different device to capture features the scanner can’t see. It’s refixturing parts because probing and scanning systems operate in separate coordinate frames. It’s exporting, importing, and realigning data because two tools that should work together were never designed to.
Each of these costs just a few minutes on their own, but when you stack them on an inspection plan with dozens of features, across a shift or across a week, those “gaps” add up to more lost time than the scanning ever consumed.
…

Add new comment