I’ve been reading about the 1.5 sigma shift for some time. Several different interpretations have been published and people are losing sleep over this matter. Some have even driven a stake into the ground to fervidly defend their position. My intent in writing this column is to simplify understanding of 1.5 sigma shift in contributing to a greater ease of use for the Six Sigma methodology. Following are the best two definitions I could find on 1.5 sigma shift:
"1.5-sigma shifts and drifts: The theory that over time any process in control will shift from its target by a value of up to 1.5 sigma. Allowing for the 1.5 sigma shift results in the generally accepted six sigma value of 3.4 defects per million opportunities. Ignoring the 1.5 sigma shift results in a six sigma value of 2 defects per billion opportunities." (from ASQ’s Six Sigma Forum Magazine)
…
Comments
thank you sir ,it was v.good
thank you sir ,it was v.good article
i wander if there is a relation between confidence intervals and 1.5 sigma shifting ???
Utter Nonsense
The "shift" started with uni drop-out, Mr Bill Smith and his out-of-control molding process that happened to drift “as much as 1.5 sigma”, because of his tampering. He was a strong advocate of Deming but clearly did not understand the meaning of process tampering. He claimed his parts "shrank 15%". It is not clear whether he was making sponge cakes.
Smith’s buddy, self-confessed con man Harry, a school teacher graduate from the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers' College, “proved” Smith's disaster happened for every process in the world ... based on the height of a stack of discs! Most folk never bothered to check, this utter farce.
My video shows the origin of the nonsense, as described in Harry's book "Resolving the Mysteries of Six Sigma".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kZbJLHK_4M
Add new comment