{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Training

Good Trouble

In which ‘complainers’ become cohorts

NewSaetiew / iStock

Bruce Hamilton
Bio
Wed, 03/04/2026 - 12:02
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

In 1960, organizational psychologist Douglas McGregor introduced a conceptual framework of two contrasting theories about human motivation that grounded my Toyota Production System (TPS) learning.

ADVERTISEMENT

His Theory X was based on the assumption that workers are fundamentally lazy and can’t be trusted to do good work in the absence of close supervision. As a student at Wayne State University in midtown Detroit, McGregor had ample opportunity to observe the effects of Theory X in U.S. auto factories during the post-World War II mass production boom. His book The Human Side of Enterprise (McGraw Hill, latest edition 2006) called prevailing management assumptions and systems into question, noting Theory X’s self-fulfilling consequences of workforce disengagement and distrust. Frontline employees were motivated primarily by fear and a paycheck to do the minimum required.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Dr. Victor E. Sower (not verified) on Wed, 03/04/2026 - 09:39

Couldn't Agree More

Before embarking on a career in academia, I took over as GM of a manufacturing firm.  The previous GM was very much a Theory X manager.  As you did, I spent a considerable amount of my time with my subordinates convincing them that our management style was going to change (all but one bought in) and with my first line employees.  I encountered the same "You don't even know what I do" reaction.  My response was similar to yours "You are right.  Show me what you do and tell me how I can help you do it better."  It took just a few months of walking the talk to gain the trust of my hourly employees.  After some initial encouragement, and given more freedom to make decisions, supervisory employees followed my example and enthusiastically bought in to the new way of managing and being managed.  Operational performance greatly improved under the new system. 

  • Reply

Submitted by dangermoney on Thu, 03/05/2026 - 13:35

Short and sweet

I love to see an article that gives some brief theoretical background and then connects it to lived experience and the lessons that follow from it. Excellent signal-to-noise ratio. 

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us