NewSaetiew / iStock
In 1960, organizational psychologist Douglas McGregor introduced a conceptual framework of two contrasting theories about human motivation that grounded my Toyota Production System (TPS) learning.
|
ADVERTISEMENT |
His Theory X was based on the assumption that workers are fundamentally lazy and can’t be trusted to do good work in the absence of close supervision. As a student at Wayne State University in midtown Detroit, McGregor had ample opportunity to observe the effects of Theory X in U.S. auto factories during the post-World War II mass production boom. His book The Human Side of Enterprise (McGraw Hill, latest edition 2006) called prevailing management assumptions and systems into question, noting Theory X’s self-fulfilling consequences of workforce disengagement and distrust. Frontline employees were motivated primarily by fear and a paycheck to do the minimum required.
…

Comments
Couldn't Agree More
Before embarking on a career in academia, I took over as GM of a manufacturing firm. The previous GM was very much a Theory X manager. As you did, I spent a considerable amount of my time with my subordinates convincing them that our management style was going to change (all but one bought in) and with my first line employees. I encountered the same "You don't even know what I do" reaction. My response was similar to yours "You are right. Show me what you do and tell me how I can help you do it better." It took just a few months of walking the talk to gain the trust of my hourly employees. After some initial encouragement, and given more freedom to make decisions, supervisory employees followed my example and enthusiastically bought in to the new way of managing and being managed. Operational performance greatly improved under the new system.
Short and sweet
I love to see an article that gives some brief theoretical background and then connects it to lived experience and the lessons that follow from it. Excellent signal-to-noise ratio.
Add new comment