{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Deregulation Under Trump Won’t Create a Windfall for Manufacturers

A case of being careful what you ask for?

Regulatory reform is not a silver bullet for competitiveness
Credit: Gage Skidmore

Peter Bussey
Tue, 02/14/2017 - 12:02
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

A central tenet of President Trump’s campaign platform was reducing the regulatory burden on businesses, with the desired effect of facilitating business expansion, job creation, and economic growth. This raises questions about how the regulatory landscape will change and the effect on the industrial sector.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regulatory compliance costs have a major impact on the global manufacturing landscape. In the United States alone, manufacturers spend an estimated $192 billion per year to comply with financial, safety, and environmental regulations. This is the equivalent of an 11-percent “regulatory compliance tax.” Much of this is from environmental emissions regulations. (Source: Manufacturing Institute.)

In many cases, U.S. manufacturers spend more on regulatory compliance than those elsewhere in the world. This has major implications for competitiveness, and decisions on where production facilities and jobs will be located.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
Top Stories
Problem Solving and Continuous Improvement Are Not the Same
Run It Past the Murder Board
The Art of Forecasting: Part 2
How Many Units Should Be in the Metric System?
Quality Is the Common Thread in a Changing Industry

Add new comment

Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us