{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Training

Bears Repeating: Given Two Different Numbers...

Is it statistically significant? Who cares?

Davis Balestracci
Bio
Tue, 02/17/2015 - 12:17
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

I have evolved to using fewer, simpler tools in my consulting and have never been more effective, as I commented upon in my last column. It made me ponder the relevance of much of what I learned in my master’s statistics program. Thinking of the most basic concepts, I decided to look up what the American Society for Quality considers the (Six Sigma) Green Belt body of knowledge. If you click on its link, I want to draw your particular attention to: “III. Six Sigma—Measure (B, C, D),” “IV. Six Sigma—Analyze (A. B),” and “V. Six Sigma—Improve & Control (A, B).”

ADVERTISEMENT

In the foreword to Quality Improvement Through Planned Experimentation, by Ronald Moen, Thomas Nolan, and Lloyd Provost (McGraw-Hill, 2012)—which I believe is the best book on industrial design of experiments—Deming himself writes:

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
You Might Like...
What's a 150-year Old Meat Chopper Have to do With America's Favorite Muscle Car?
How DIY AI Unlocks Productivity and Flexibility
Which KPIs Prove Your Maintenance Plan Is Working?
How to Reverse Engineer Classic Car Parts
Don’t Shake Before You Listen

Comments

Submitted by Rip Stauffer on Wed, 02/18/2015 - 10:22

Great, great example, Davis!

It remains as true as ever...any fool can make a trend out of two points! What does it say about those who manage using those "trends?"

  • Reply

Submitted by dkhays on Mon, 02/23/2015 - 06:05

statistics

Do you suppose they got what they were looking for?  Not necessarily what the data says.  A set of numbers can be manipulated to get what you are looking for.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us