{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Statistical Stratification, Part 2

The alternative to the ‘simple, obvious, and wrong’ SWAG

Davis Balestracci
Tue, 09/30/2014 - 14:46
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

My last article demonstrated a common incorrect technique—based in “traditional” statistics—for comparing performances based on percentage rates. This article will use the same data to show what should be done instead.

ADVERTISEMENT

To quickly review the scenario: In an effort to reduce unnecessary expensive prescriptions, a pharmacy administrator developed a proposal to monitor and compare individual physicians’ tendencies to prescribe the most expensive drug within a class. Data were obtained for a peer group of 51 physicians including the total number of prescriptions written, and, of that number, how many were for the target drug.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
Top Stories
ISO 9001:2026 Ethics and Quality Culture
Avoiding the 7 Deadly Killers of Projects
ISO 9001:2026 Is Here
A Passing Gauge R&R Doesn’t Mean the Measurement System Is Capable
Don’t Buy the Fix Before You Find the Problem

Comments

Submitted by Petoskeytj on Thu, 10/02/2014 - 04:29

Question regarding calculations

Doctor-

Another excellent article.  Two questions:

1)  I don't have or need the raw data, but because I don't have that, I can not figure out what entry is used in the ANOM for # of prescriptions written.  I would think it would be the number of individual prescriptions for the targeted drug an individual doctor has written, rather than the bulk # of prescriptions written (4000+) or the bulk # of prescriptions for the drug in question (596).  Can you enlighten me?

2)  Where does the formula for the ANOM come from?

Regards and thanks again,

Tom Johnson

  • Reply

Add new comment

Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us