{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Regulatory Science Is Not Boring

Seriously. Really. I’m not kidding.

Susan Kelly
Fri, 11/09/2012 - 11:37
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

I’m a relative newcomer to government work, having joined the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about 18 months ago after decades of being a journalist. My job is to assign, write, and edit FDA consumer updates, which are news stories posted on www.fda.gov designed to give consumers important information in language that’s easy to understand—not too technical or bureaucratic.

ADVERTISEMENT

To endear myself to my new colleagues, I decided to write about anything we saw as boring, leaving them to write about the hotter topics. I’m not easily bored, so I thought this would work as a noble gesture.

Even with this resolve, my heart sank when I was asked to write about regulatory science—one of the FDA’s highest priorities. Do you remember the character Chandler Bing from the TV show Friends? I could hear his voice in my head: “Could this be more boring?”

But I resolutely set about my task, and five consumer updates later, I’m here to tell you that regulatory science is not boring. Not even close.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
Top Stories
Beyond the Statistics: Implementing the New VDA AIAG SPC Manual
All Whys Are Not The Same
Flying Blind: What Your Quality Data Miss Every Shift
Book Preview
The Psychology of AI Adoption at Work
Momentum Technologies Achieves Record Purity Milestones for Rare Earths

Comments

Submitted by fency on Fri, 11/23/2012 - 06:04

Regulatory Science Is Not Boring

These days, the field requires expertise from scientists in a variety of disciplines, including physicists, life scientists, chemists, and engineers.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us