{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

What’s in a Name?

The ISO management representative

Denise Robitaille
Tue, 05/13/2008 - 22:00
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

Unlike many other requirements in ISO 9001, the subclause dealing with the ISO management representative is rarely the subject of debate. In fact, it doesn’t get nearly as much consideration as it deserves.

Traditionally, it’s assumed that the quality manager gets the job by default. If the organization doesn’t have a quality manager, then it falls to the manager of quality control or someone else whose title has something to do with quality. The word “quality” appears to be the deciding modifier. The whole “management” concept doesn’t get even a perfunctory nod.

ISO 9001 doesn’t specify what department or function the representative should come from. It does, however, clearly state that the individual shall be “… a member of management …”

This isn’t only a semantical discourse. It gets to the heart of management’s effective, dynamic involvement in the quality management system. It determines whether the ISO registration is just a wall hanging or a living commitment to customer satisfaction and organizational sustainability. It decreases the likelihood that management review will sound like a postmortem and augments the possibility of dialog wherein fulfillment of the requirements of ISO 9001 relates directly to substantiated decision-making, improvement, mitigation of risk, and innovation.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
Top Stories
What FDA Warning Letters Reveal About Records, Spreadsheets, and AI
The Art of Forecasting: Part 1
Avoiding the 7 Deadly Killers of Projects
AI Layoffs Need Evidence, Not Executive Storytelling
ISO 9001:2026 Is Here

Add new comment

Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us