Is this article written by AI? It's very impressive for containing 1500 words and not a single ounce of substance. It's an advertisement with zero demonstration of anything, and it imagines a lot of scenarios without imbuing them with any compelling wisdom or experience. It reads exactly like the output of an LLM or a high school junior doing a creative writing exercise. 

I'm not saying that AI is *not* reshaping quality assurance across industries. But this article just imagines everything you might imagine as the ways that AI *could* reshape quality assurance across industries, and then it claims that it's happening, without providing any examples or—more important to me—any of the nice bits of wisdom that accumulate from these imaginary things actually being put into practice and reshaped by reality (e.g., "you might *think* it'd be like *this*, but actually what we found was..."). 

It's a shame to see stuff like this on Quality Digest.

"Having AI systems in your quality assurance process will ensure that your tests are always consistent and free from any bias or oversight." 

X