{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Unreasonableness

Muri happens when the team hears conflicting directions from infallible authorities

Bruce Hamilton
Tue, 04/21/2015 - 11:59
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Sometimes we receive unreasonable and confusing directions, and sometimes we give them.

ADVERTISEMENT

As in the short video clip below, even if the systems behind this confusion are sound and the motivations reasonable, when you put them together they can create a frustrating no-win situation:

Here are a few examples from my recent experience:

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by ntrprizxile on Fri, 04/24/2015 - 13:49

Great Article

Bruce great points.  I have seen many examples similar to yours where there are conflicting requirements and the worker or manager as the case may be is forced to choose.  

I have also seen cases where the management metrics corporate has given to a satellite office are vague allowing the office to "interpret" the metrics to their benefit.  Example:  A claims processing office was given a goal to improve the cycle time of claims.  Claims cycle time was measured from the time the claim was input into the system until the time it was completed and approved.  To get clear data on improvement, management said it will measure the improvements only on new claims.  One regional office changed the start dates on all claims in progress to the date the management directive came out, thus showing a dramatic improvement in claims processing time.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us