{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Training

Some Hazardous Ideas

And why they are wrong

Nick Fewings / Unsplash

Donald J. Wheeler
Bio

SPC Press

Thu, 05/28/2026 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

In the 1980s, demand for SPC classes outstripped the supply of competent instructors. Novices were teaching neophytes, and misinformation could be found everywhere. Out of this chaos, many incorrect ideas about process behavior charts became widely circulated. These ideas continue to be spread by those who don’t know any better and by those who use them to try to discredit SPC and sell more-complex techniques. Since these ideas can lead to the misuse of data, they’re hazardous in practice.

ADVERTISEMENT

My colleague Allen Scott provided me with a list of many of these hazardous ideas that he found currently in circulation. Eight of these ideas are listed below, along with a brief explanation of the fallacies contained therein.

‘SPC is not needed with stable process’

It’s been said that once we have reengineered our process and gotten things working smoothly we no longer need to use SPC to monitor the process.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Dr Tony Burns on Thu, 05/28/2026 - 15:23

Great work

Great work Don and Allen.

I would have no trouble putting names to some of the nonsense claims.  Other nonsensical claims are widely perpetrated by victims of the Sick Sigma Scam.

  • Reply

Submitted by Fausto Galetto (not verified) on Wed, 06/03/2026 - 08:28

Control Charts with Exponential data

Dear fiends

I would inform you that BIGGER mistakes are present about "Control Charts with Exponential data".

Many professors compute wrongly the LCL and UCL for "Individual Control Charts with Exponential data".

You can find a sample by seaching the "Garden of Flowers ..." in Academia.edu

Regards

FG

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us