In the 1980s, demand for SPC classes outstripped the supply of competent instructors. Novices were teaching neophytes, and misinformation could be found everywhere. Out of this chaos, many incorrect ideas about process behavior charts became widely circulated. These ideas continue to be spread by those who don’t know any better and by those who use them to try to discredit SPC and sell more-complex techniques. Since these ideas can lead to the misuse of data, they’re hazardous in practice.
|
ADVERTISEMENT |
My colleague Allen Scott provided me with a list of many of these hazardous ideas that he found currently in circulation. Eight of these ideas are listed below, along with a brief explanation of the fallacies contained therein.
‘SPC is not needed with stable process’
It’s been said that once we have reengineered our process and gotten things working smoothly we no longer need to use SPC to monitor the process.
…

Comments
Great work
Great work Don and Allen.
I would have no trouble putting names to some of the nonsense claims. Other nonsensical claims are widely perpetrated by victims of the Sick Sigma Scam.
Control Charts with Exponential data
Dear fiends
I would inform you that BIGGER mistakes are present about "Control Charts with Exponential data".
Many professors compute wrongly the LCL and UCL for "Individual Control Charts with Exponential data".
You can find a sample by seaching the "Garden of Flowers ..." in Academia.edu
Regards
FG
Add new comment