{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

What Should Really Trigger a CAPA?

CAPA-worthy or CAPA-happy?

Sara Adams
Tue, 02/22/2022 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

Corrective and preventive action (CAPA) is often a thorn in the side of medical device manufacturers. Problems with CAPA top the list of reasons for 483s and warning letters from the FDA year after year, and many companies struggle to identify when they should even initiate a CAPA.

ADVERTISEMENT

When companies are uncertain about what should trigger a CAPA, they tend to make one of two mistakes:
• They get “CAPA happy.” In this case, every incident is treated as CAPA-worthy, which leads to mountains of paperwork and enormous stress. As the CAPAs pile up, the backlog slows progress to a crawl, and the company may suffer “death by CAPA.”
• They ignore CAPA-worthy issues. On the other hand, some companies don’t escalate issues to CAPA when action is warranted. This underuse of the CAPA process leaves them vulnerable to 483s and warning letters from FDA, and has an adverse effect on the safety and efficacy of their devices.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
Top Stories
All Whys Are Not The Same
Flying Blind: What Your Quality Data Miss Every Shift
The 6 Best Quality Management Software Features That Simplify Your QMS
AI May Be Making Your Quality Problem Worse
Momentum Technologies Achieves Record Purity Milestones for Rare Earths

Comments

Submitted by Cesar Rios (not verified) on Mon, 02/21/2022 - 08:32

COMMENT

EXCELLENT ANALYSIS... thank you

  • Reply

Add new comment

Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us