{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Statistical Stratification, Part 2

The alternative to the ‘simple, obvious, and wrong’ SWAG

Davis Balestracci
Tue, 09/30/2014 - 14:46
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

My last article demonstrated a common incorrect technique—based in “traditional” statistics—for comparing performances based on percentage rates. This article will use the same data to show what should be done instead.

ADVERTISEMENT

To quickly review the scenario: In an effort to reduce unnecessary expensive prescriptions, a pharmacy administrator developed a proposal to monitor and compare individual physicians’ tendencies to prescribe the most expensive drug within a class. Data were obtained for a peer group of 51 physicians including the total number of prescriptions written, and, of that number, how many were for the target drug.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Petoskeytj on Thu, 10/02/2014 - 04:29

Question regarding calculations

Doctor-

Another excellent article.  Two questions:

1)  I don't have or need the raw data, but because I don't have that, I can not figure out what entry is used in the ANOM for # of prescriptions written.  I would think it would be the number of individual prescriptions for the targeted drug an individual doctor has written, rather than the bulk # of prescriptions written (4000+) or the bulk # of prescriptions for the drug in question (596).  Can you enlighten me?

2)  Where does the formula for the ANOM come from?

Regards and thanks again,

Tom Johnson

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us