{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Regulatory Harmonization: IMDRF, GHWP, and the Road Ahead

As medical device companies sell into more nations, the industry needs practical, adoptable regulatory approaches

Dirk Dusharme/Adobe

Grant Ramaley

Aseptico

Wed, 08/26/2026 - 12:02
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

Medical device companies selling into multiple countries don’t answer to one global regulator. They navigate a patchwork of national requirements that two organizations are trying to align in very different ways. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) and the Global Harmonization Working Party (GHWP) share the same broad goal, but their founding circumstances produced different ideas about who belongs at the table and how much control the table should have.

This is not an academic distinction. IMDRF is under new leadership and developing a “playbook” meant to make regulatory convergence more usable. Singapore, as the 2026 IMDRF chair with deep roots in both organizations, is well positioned to bridge them. What’s decided during the next year will likely determine whether manufacturers get a genuinely workable path to multiple markets or one more layer of requirements to manage on top of what they already navigate. 

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
Top Stories
ISO 9001:2026 Ethics and Quality Culture
Your First 12 Months of ISO 9001:2026 Transition: An Auditor’s Perspective
Why Remote Work Isn’t Working
A Blueprint for Keeping Humans in Control of AI
ISO 9001:2026 Is Here

Add new comment

Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us