{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Training

Applying FMEA to AI-Augmented Medical Devices

A practical risk management framework

wedmoments.stock/Adobe

Sai Ranjith
Bio

Sanofi

Mon, 07/20/2026 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration scrutiny of AI and machine learning in medical devices is intensifying. Yet most companies still apply failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) methods designed for deterministic hardware failures. AI failures are probabilistic, context-dependent, and often silent. A model trained on one population drifts in deployment. An algorithm confident in a prediction is fundamentally wrong.

ADVERTISEMENT

This article provides a practical, step-by-step framework for integrating AI-specific risk management into ISO 14971 and IEC 62304 workflows to reduce regulatory risk, accelerate FDA approvals, and achieve competitive differentiation.

The challenge: Why traditional FMEA falls short

Consider a medical imaging device with AI lesion detection. Traditional FMEA identifies hardware risks (detector failure) and software risks (processing crashes). But it misses critical AI-specific failures. The following scenarios illustrate how.

Model drift: Trained on Western populations with modern equipment; accuracy drops 8–15% when deployed internationally or in sites with older equipment.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by C.G (not verified) on Mon, 07/20/2026 - 12:26

Opportunity to speak

Hello Sam,

I am very intrigued with your comments abbots AI application in FMEA. I would like to see if you will be open togging a one hour presentation in ASQ section events.

Sincerely,

C.G.Mistry

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us