{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

ISO 14001, ISO 50001 Benefit the Environment and the Bottom Line

A matter of muda

William A. Levinson
Mon, 12/17/2018 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

The U.S. government’s Fourth National Climate Assessment warns that climate change “creates new risks and exacerbates existing vulnerabilities in communities across the United States, presenting growing challenges to human health and safety, quality of life, and the rate of economic growth.” The same report mentions increased risks of wildfires along with droughts in the Southwest.1 There are numerous financial advantages, regardless of the role of carbon emissions in climate change, to use ISO 50001:2018—“Energy management systems—Requirements with guidance for use” to reduce these emissions, and also to adapt its new clauses to the environmental management system ISO 14001:2015.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 12/17/2018 - 10:55

why so equivocal on climate change?

It is certainly occuring and it is certainly attributable to man-made causes.

You undercut your credibility by downplaying the risks

  • Reply

Submitted by Michael Ejercito (not verified) on Sat, 01/05/2019 - 08:32

In reply to why so equivocal on climate change? by Anonymous (not verified)

Climate Change vs. Climate Change®™

There is a difference between climate change and Climate Change®™.

sunken cities are proven fact, and new York may very well be undeerwater in a few centuries, much like Heracleion is today. 

But Climate Change®™ is a hoax. 

  http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/06/foreigners_see_president_trump.html#vf-11000109963048 "Climate change" is just another left wing political pseudo religion like Lysenkoism.  If you have to lie about the data, it's for a reason.  Trofim Lysenko, for his personal aggrandizement, destroyed Soviet agriculture to the point where it could never recover.  Like him, the Al Gores of this world want to destroy the U.S. economy for their own benefit. 

  • Reply

Submitted by Dr Burns (not verified) on Tue, 12/18/2018 - 22:30

No evidence

There is no evidence whatsoever that man's CO2 has caused any of the warming since the Little Ice Age. Anyone who claims otherwise, should present evidence.  I have spoken to Dr Trenberth, IPCC ... he claimed the evidence was sea levels.  He ran away when I pointed out that sea levels have been rising at a DECREASING rate for the past 20,000 years.

When Jerico was being built, the Earth warming 16 TIMES faster.

Global warming is just another scam.

  • Reply

Submitted by Grace Duffy on Sat, 01/12/2019 - 08:05

Excellent treatment of what could be a deadly subject

Bill has outdone himself with his approach to identifying hazardous and energy waste. His examples are most entertaining. I kept reading not only for the point of the article, but because I wanted to see what Bill would use next as an example of another waste. I learned a lot from the article and had fun at the same time. Well done!!!

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us