In the larger organizations I worked for as a quality leader, supplier auditing was almost always calendar-driven. Sometimes supplier audits happened once a year; in other places, they might happen twice. I’d build the schedule to accommodate that, and the system would just run.
|
ADVERTISEMENT |
Over time, I shifted to a risk-based approach where how deeply and how often I audited a supplier wasn’t based on a calendar date, but rather on individual supplier risk.
How you determine high vs. low risk is critical, and a key focus for regulators under the new U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) quality management system regulation (QMSR).
Let’s take a closer look at the benefits of risk-based supplier audits and the data that supports them, plus what the FDA and registrars look for when evaluating your supplier program.
…

Comments
One more factor for supplier risk
This article is right on target with its core premise of calendar-based supplier audits being inefficient and disconnected from business reality. I would add a third factor for evaluating supplier rsk: QMS maturity. In other words, how developed and robust is the supplier's QMS? This is completely different from criticality and performance, but it certainly has an undeniable effect on risk.
Add new comment