{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Training

Why Risk-Based Supplier Audits Are Replacing Calendar-Based Audits

Save time and spend it on suppliers that need attention

Maddi Bazzocco / Unsplash

Stephanie Ojeda
Bio

AssurX

Tue, 06/30/2026 - 12:02
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

In the larger organizations I worked for as a quality leader, supplier auditing was almost always calendar-driven. Sometimes supplier audits happened once a year; in other places, they might happen twice. I’d build the schedule to accommodate that, and the system would just run.

ADVERTISEMENT

Over time, I shifted to a risk-based approach where how deeply and how often I audited a supplier wasn’t based on a calendar date, but rather on individual supplier risk.

How you determine high vs. low risk is critical, and a key focus for regulators under the new U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) quality management system regulation (QMSR).

Let’s take a closer look at the benefits of risk-based supplier audits and the data that supports them, plus what the FDA and registrars look for when evaluating your supplier program.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Carig Cochran (not verified) on Tue, 06/30/2026 - 08:33

One more factor for supplier risk

This article is right on target with its core premise of calendar-based supplier audits being inefficient and disconnected from business reality. I would add a third factor for evaluating supplier rsk: QMS maturity. In other words, how developed and robust is the supplier's QMS? This is completely different from criticality and performance, but it certainly has an undeniable effect on risk.  

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us