{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Training

How Experts Use Decades of Knowledge: Content, Context, Consequence

A discussion with Octave’s Prashant Darisi and Vick Vaishnavi

Tom Parkes/Unsplash

Megan Wallin-Kerth
Bio
Tue, 07/28/2026 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

Speaking with experts who love their jobs usually makes you aware of two things simultaneously: 1) how much you don’t know, and 2) how much you’d like to know. My conversations with Prashant Darisi and Vick Vaishnavi were no exception. I walked away with an appreciation for the decades of expertise, knowledge, and experience behind Octave’s key players, and a more solid understanding of how these elements have developed a human-centered AI platform that doesn’t replace human potential so much as magnify it.

ADVERTISEMENT

This, in a world where many big companies are tempted to prioritize monetary gain as they skim over the details, is not only a point of principle but a distinct advantage in terms of quality.

How? For one thing, there’s no shortage of people providing the data and context to keep AI in check (ask Vaishnavi), and for another, the tasks involved are inherently more connected and supported by a wide range of professionals and operational use standards than ever (ask Darisi).

I began with general questions. 

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by dangermoney on Tue, 07/28/2026 - 09:01

cool advert

It really feels a type of way when someone is selling you something by pretending to empathise with the world you live in, while betraying that they've never lived there themselves. The anecdotes all exude a cargo cult understanding of quality management. 

"There are many people who can quantify risk on a scale of zero to 10."

"And then I have a QMS that tells me, oh, your quality’s up, down, etc." 

"You may do a root cause and realize, hey, it’s how we built it and assembled it that was a problem, the way we were doing it to specs. And then the build guys will say, geez, we only did what you told us. It was functions as design. [sic] So you know what? It’s really a design problem. So to navigate this little loop, if you will, between the design, build, operate, protect, you really want it to be a continuous improvement cycle." 

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us