{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

The Rising Need for Quality Control Within the Cannabis Industry

The smart move would be for producers to treat their cannabis as if it were a pharmaceutical drug

Rachel Mann
Thu, 04/11/2019 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

With medical cannabis being legal in Canada since 2002, and recreational use becoming legal in 2018, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s promise to his country has caused a storm.

ADVERTISEMENT

This legal framework has given Canadian companies the leverage to lead the cannabis industry to new heights. Not only supplying to Canada, companies have now seen an opportunity in Europe, where more countries are moving toward a less stringent approach concerning cannabis. The decision to move to more relaxed regulations even hit the United Kingdom in 2018, when the government legalized usage for medical purposes, joining countries like Germany, Denmark, Ireland, and Greece.

Despite what one’s view on this subject may be, demand is clearly extensive, with industry experts like Stephen Murphy, co-founder of Prohibition Partners, predicting the market will go “from zero to €56 billion (£49 billion) in a decade.”

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by clayton mccann (not verified) on Fri, 04/12/2019 - 08:01

The rest of your argument.

Cannabis is a bioremediator, an organism that soaks up toxicity from its growing medium. Cannabis can deliver these toxins (should they exist) to the central nervous system of the end-use consumer. Foremost, speaking from my research into recreational cannabis production, my chief concern is for "other ingredients" (some listed on product labels, most are not) in commercial-grade fertilizers, as well as chemicals Health Canada permits Licensed Producers of MJ to apply to cannabis plants under production. The concern stems from the fact that cannabis will be legal, by 17 October 2019, to consume through ingestion (e.g. "edibles," tinctures, and oils). My project concerns making the independent determination that the fertilizers (and their constituents) employed in the production of consumer-grade cannabis. 

Take, for example, 20-20-20, a fertilizer used in cannabis production. Canada policy framework oversees this range of fertilization products. 20-20-20 contains 20% Nitrogen mass/volume, 20% Phosphorous, and 20% Potassium. Yes? N-P-K. This leaves 40% mass/volume of the contents of the bag. Are these "contents" required to be listed by law? They are not. Does the FDA know what these contents are? It does not. So what's the problem? 

Recent and longitudinal research-1 indicates that nickel, mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium have been showing up in commercial- and consumer-grade fertilizers. What I propose is to make the determinations: i. that this is not occurring in Canada, ii. it is not occurring in cannabis production contexts, iii. that it is not occurring in cannabis production contexts that produce cannabis for human ingestion, iv. and to a greater degree, that safe alternatives to these chemicals/toxins (should they persist in products) be regulated into policies governing/approving pest control, and fertilizers "other ingredients," not simply for cannabis producers but especially in food crops policy formations. Cannabis consumers don't need to be eating nickel or mercury, or even lead.

  • Reply

Submitted by Harold Malle (not verified) on Fri, 04/12/2019 - 10:38

The missing component

A very lucid and well thought out article.  All of the concepts and ideas mentioned are contained within one international standard;   ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.  The standard has requirements for quality control.  What really is required to protect the customer is legislation requiring the analysis for this new product to be done by accredited testing laboratories that would be inspected on a regular basis.  The requirement can be based on looking at cannabis as a pharmaceutical drug or more likely a food product.  At least this way the quality component would be measurable.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us