{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Mayberry, Ppk: Episode 1

Making intuitive sense of capability output

Patrick Runkel
Mon, 08/27/2012 - 11:32
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

In this episode, Sheriff Andy Taylor uses cars and parking spaces to explain process capability to Deputy Barney Fife.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sheriff Taylor: What's wrong, Barney?
Barney: Someone spilled alphabet soup all over my capability output! Wait till I catch the practical joker who did this! They'll be sorry!!
Sheriff Taylor: That's not alphabet soup, Barney. Those are capability indices.
Barney: I don't see any indecisives, Andy. I just see a big mess of letters: Cp, Pp, Cpk, Ppk, Cpm, PPM... LMAO!
Sheriff Taylor: LMAO is not part of capability output, Barney. At any rate, the indices help you evaluate whether your process is meeting your customer requirements.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Steve Moore on Wed, 08/29/2012 - 11:17

Car Analogy

Nice article, Patrick. I have been using the car analogy for several years to help people understand capability. My analogy is slightly different in that I liken the width of the car as the process variation and the width of a garage door as the specification width. You need a Pp of at least 1.0 to have any chance of being able to get the car into the garage without scraping the paint or damaging the garage, but only if you have centered the car. If you have had a few drinks on the way home, you need a Pp larger than 1.0 to avoid the damage (allowing for some drift)! Then, of course, you have to consider the Ppk and/or Cpk in order to understand that you actually got the car into the garage safely. I'm sure these will be discussed in subsequent episodes. Best regards, Steve
  • Reply

Submitted by prunkel on Thu, 08/30/2012 - 06:11

In reply to Car Analogy by Steve Moore

Car Analogy

Thanks for your nice comment, Steve. I like your take on the car parking analogy—especially the drift and the garage door. Reminds me of when I first got my driver’s license at age 16 and ripped out half the garage door frame while backing out for the first time.  Good thing process variation is not 3-dimensional, or parking your process between the spec limits would be even more fraught with peril! (You’re right about needing to consider Ppk/Cpk along with Pp/Cp. I was nervous about breaking the post into 2 separate episodes for that very reason—but ultimately decided to present the info in bite-sized, easily digestible chunks. So Barney gets the Cpk/Ppk story in Episode 2). Cheers, Patrick

  • Reply

Submitted by Steve Moore on Fri, 08/31/2012 - 17:12

In reply to Car Analogy by prunkel

Cpm/Ppm

Patrick, I am also a fan of Cpm and Ppm to account for being on/off target.
  • Reply

Submitted by prunkel on Wed, 09/05/2012 - 04:47

In reply to Cpm/Ppm by Steve Moore

Cpm/Ppm

Thanks for your feedback, Steve.  I was debating adding episode 3 to cover Cpm/Ppm! But I received mixed feedback on how often practictioners perform capability analysis with a target value. One quality analyst told me it's not very common to use a target in the context of evaluating process capability (although there is an option in Minitab to enter a target to obtain the Ppm/Cpm estimates if one desires that output). I'm curious of your (and others') reaction to this feedback--would you disagree with the idea that it's not common to enter a target when performing a capability analysis for most applications?

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us