{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Risky Business

Does cutting costs really cut total costs?

Fred Mason
Wed, 11/14/2007 - 22:00
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

You manufacture a part that must be within design tolerances to work properly, so you need to measure it. It costs to:

  • Buy the measuring device
  • Provide a space and/or utilities for it
  • Develop fixtures or part-holding accessories
  • Make sure people are trained to do the measurements
  • Develop a system for collecting and analyzing the measurement data
  • Schedule service and maintenance of the measuring device
  • Arrange routine calibration

These costs are then amortized across all the parts that go through this measurement process. Like any process step, there is an associated cost. Even parts sitting in a bin waiting for the next process incur costs—inventory costs, in this case. With so much emphasis on cost reduction, it might be tempting to do away with the measuring process completely. What are the risks?

Don’t do it!
A knee-jerk reaction might be to skip the measurement step and take your chances. Machine tools are very accurate. If the part is set up properly, it should come out as expected. Or take the minimalist approach—mic the part while it’s on the machine tool (use a micrometer, an inexpensive hand gauge to measure a diameter). Close enough might be good enough.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us