{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Growing America

Creating jobs

Praveen Gupta
Tue, 03/06/2007 - 22:00
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

Businesses have lately been focusing on profit and process improvement. However, profit improvement at any cost to make the upcoming quarter look bright has a price. It appears that most improvement effort leads with efficiency measured by head-count reduction. Improvement shouldn’t be measured by earned profits. In fact, businesses can tumble even if a quarterly profit is reported. For better performance, businesses must achieve sustained profitable growth, not simply profit.

Lean and Six Sigma are two great improvement methodologies. Many businesses implement one, both or some creative combination, but these methodologies are often implemented without deploying their major tenets. For lean, the major tenets are “no layoffs” and “pull system.” For Six Sigma, the major tenets are “measure what is valued,” and “breakthrough improvement” or “innovation.” Instead, corporations deal with housekeeping, kanbanand floor relayout while implementing lean; and extensive training and a heavy dose of statistics in the case of Six Sigma. Of course, some improvement is realized, but it isn’t sustainable at most organizations. I’m sure there are exceptions where both the methodologies have been implemented successfully.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us