{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Leadership Styles

Pros and cons

Praveen Gupta
Tue, 08/01/2006 - 22:00
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

Considering the leadership at Motorola and General Electric provided by stalwarts such as Bob Galvin and Jack Welch, respectively, I believe that two leaders with totally different styles can get similar results using the same tools. When I worked at Motorola in Bob Galvin’s time, there was a rule that any employee who had worked more than 10 years at the company couldn’t be laid off without Galvin’s permission. On the other hand, a default rule to lay off 10 percent of its personnel every year was a common practice at GE. Both rules worked.Betsy Morris’s recent feature article "Sorry, Jack: The new business rules” in Fortunemagazine articulates that rules proven in the past may not work well today. I also believe that the past doesn’t guarantee the future. I have the highest regard for Jack Welch because of his accomplishments at GE, but I don’t agree with the "10 percent out every year" rule. W. Edwards Deming taught us that one shouldn’t grade employees, because their performance is affected by the systems of the organization. Statistically, employee performance exhibits a normal distribution. The challenge is to improve the average performance of employees in an organization, rather than terminate the bottom 10 percent.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us