{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Simple Nutrition Facts for Complicated People

Food for thought for winners of the fattest nation contest

Kimberly Egan
Tue, 02/19/2013 - 11:16
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Nutrition labels have been much in the news lately, presumably because we have once again won the fattest nation contest. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and various nutrition researchers have all put out some thought-provoking information for us to ponder.

ADVERTISEMENT

The problems

First, people don’t understand nutrition labels. The FDA learned this by conducting extensive and expensive Internet-based research that showed that if you ask people to compare products made by different manufacturers to determine which is “healthier” (whatever that means), they will not get it right. In other words, they will get it wrong. I learned the same thing, much less expensively, by talking to the more strident members of my family at the dinner table.

Also, pretty much no one reads nutrition labeling on menus. Among the reasons cited are “confusion” and the “priority of... hunger.” Good luck fighting that one. Hunger has been a priority since we descended from the trees or crawled out of the primordial soup or whatever your view of creation might be.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by shrikale on Sat, 02/23/2013 - 18:17

Real Food Doesn't Need Nutrition Labels

Dear Ms Egan,

Are we giving up on trying to get people to back to food? And, no, almost nothing in the center aisles of a grocery chain store counts as food. In my opinion, we've given up enough control to the "food" industry already.

With actual food we may not have to be so concerned with portion control or nutrition labels. I think nature has programmed us, our bodies, with robust control mechanisms that way.

I read Michael Pollan's "In Defence of Food: An Eater's Manifesto" a while ago. And, one advice is forever etched in my brain: Eat mostly plants, especially leaves. Perhaps we should work not on making nutrition labels better, but getting rid of the need for them altogether?

Best regards, Shrikant Kalegaonkar (twitter: @shrikale, LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/shrikale/)

  • Reply

Submitted by Ken Stephens on Mon, 03/04/2013 - 11:22

Kimberly

"and men don't" is too exclusive!!!  Perhaps, "many men don't", or "most men don't" --- I read labels with or without my wife. We have a long list of no-nos that we will not buy -- and one of them is American made choclates -- we have yet to find any without trans-fatty acids.

Thanks for your interesting article.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us