{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

When Do We Use Subgrouped Data?

A problem with service-sector average charts

Donald J. Wheeler
Mon, 04/30/2012 - 11:32
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

When the data come along one value at a time, we tend to put them on a chart for individual values (an XmR chart). Since virtually all business and managerial data occur one value at a time, the primary chart for service-sector data is the XmR chart. Yet the original process behavior chart was the average and range chart (also known as an X-bar and R chart). The advantages, restrictions, and issues surrounding average and range charts are the topics of this article.

ADVERTISEMENT

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by knowwareman on Wed, 05/02/2012 - 10:30

Getting Service Employees to Use Control Charts

Donald is correct. My observation, however, is that few service employees use any form of a control chart. Having attended many Institute for Healthcare Improvement and National Association of Healthcare Quality conferences and looked at hundreds of improvement posters, virtually all still use a bar chart for time series data.

First, let's get people using control charts, even if it's an XmR used when it isn't the best choice, then let's get them to understand rational subgrouping. With the Excel-based SPC software available today, there's no excuse for using bar charts when control charts are so readily available.

  • Reply

Submitted by kkbari on Wed, 05/02/2012 - 13:04

Quick trick for assessing

Good article.  A quick “trick” to help identify the warnings that Wheeler gives about incorrect subgrouping is to look at the range chart.  For subgroup sizes less than 7, in theory it is likely that if you have rational subgroups you can have a subgroup range of 0 from time to time.  Even though there might not be a 0 on the R chart, you can expect that it is possible to see a 0 from time to time over the long haul.  In both examples provided, Figures 4 and 8 show ranges that look more like Xbar charts – distributed consistently above and below Rbar, but more importantly no range values remotely close to 0.  That alone should be a strong indicator that the subgrouping is not so rational.

  • Reply

Submitted by JOSE ARREOLA on Fri, 05/04/2012 - 18:02

SO, WHY IS SO IMPORTANT?

Why is subgrouping used, taught and learned in almost all books & seminars? The article tells us when not to use it, but how to know when we must use it?

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us