{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

5S First?

Always do what you should do, not what you can do

Bruce Hamilton
Mon, 01/16/2012 - 12:20
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Some time ago, while speaking at a conference in the land down under, I was taken to task by a participant for suggesting, “5S is usually the first improvement” in lean implementation. I had carelessly adopted this posture because, as a consultant, I had found that workplace organization was usually the most palatable way to demonstrate improvement on the shop floor.

ADVERTISEMENT

I’m not sure of this, but I think the sixth S–safety—was added at U.S. manufacturers during the 1980s because improved safety was the only thing management and labor adversaries could agree on.

“That may or may not be so,” my friendly heckler responded. “But just because 5S is easy, should that make it first?”

“What do you suggest as a first step to improvement?” I asked.

“Kanban,” he replied. “A pull system is the thread that holds everything else together.”

“Pull systems are a tough place to begin,” I offered. “Maybe it would better for a company to get its feet wet on something less conceptually challenging.”

“No,” he shot back. “The pull system is where my company started, and it’s worked very well, end to end.”

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Steve Moore on Wed, 01/18/2012 - 08:24

Heckler

Your heckler was wrong. 5S (done right) is NOT easy. When done right, 5S reveals many opportunities for improvement AND improves safety performance. I have visited many paper mills in the past 35 years. My empirical knowledge is that when you see a mill with good housekeeping, their safety and quality performance is usually good as well. Poor housekeeping almost always indicates lower safety and quality performance. 5S is indeed a good place to start.
  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us