{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

How Much Quality Is Enough?

How could it not be beneficial for a firm to improve quality? Well...

Stewart Anderson
Tue, 05/31/2011 - 12:54
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

Often a firm is confronted with the key question of whether the quality of its products and services should be improved. For many readers, the question may even seem illogical: How could it not be beneficial for a firm to improve the quality of its products and services?

On closer analysis, however, the question has deep strategic implications because ultimately, a firm’s market structure and competition influence its choice of quality. Incurring additional costs to provide a level of quality that is neither valued by consumers nor provides sufficient differentiation from the competition may be unwise in the long run.

ADVERTISEMENT

The purpose of strategy is to create a deliberate plan of action that creates a competitive advantage for a firm. The firm that achieves the highest rates of profitability in its industry is the one that has attained a competitive advantage over rivals.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by julianusunov on Fri, 06/03/2011 - 10:53

Quality Level

Congratulations & thanks, Stewart. I claim the same in terms of quality philosophy and economics but I am grateful for your operationalization of this thesis through specific indicators which are visualized in a simple and effective graph.

Julian

  • Reply

Submitted by Jcheco on Fri, 06/03/2011 - 16:34

In reply to Quality Level by julianusunov

Is that quality?

The statement " Incurring additional costs to provide a level of quality that is neither valued by consumers nor provides sufficient differentiation from the competition may be unwise in the long run" brings me to the question that if something is not valued by the customer can we call that quality? For me quality is always customer related.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us