{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Solving the Quality by Design Dilemma

Great theory, tough application

Julie Fraser
Wed, 01/04/2012 - 11:20
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Quality by design (QbD) is a widely discussed approach that is often neither well understood nor effectively executed. Joseph Juran also called QbD “quality planning.” QbD is not primarily focused on typical quality issues such as corrective action, testing, measurement, or monitoring. QbD is a holistic approach to planning to ensure quality is inherent in products and processes.

ADVERTISEMENT

QbD starts with quality goals, and identifying customers and their true needs. This sets up the target and meaningful goals for the quality program. Meaningful goals are those that customers care about and will thus pay for in your products.

Product and process design drive quality performance. These are clearly shown on the inner ring in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) QbD graphic in figure 1.


Figure 1: Quality by design (QbD) concept as presented by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by erralston on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:23

Quality Planning Underutilized

Julie has hit on some excellent points.  Quality Planning is one of 3 components of the Juran Trilogy.  Many organizations are investing heavily in Quality Control, and even more so in Quality Improvement, but fail to take the lessons learned and apply to Quality Planning (a.k.a. Quality by Design).  Therefore many products and services are "dead on arrival" because they are not designed to meet the current needs of customers, or the delivery processes are not designed to meet the required capability.  Companies would be wise to re-balance their investment in Quality to address all 3 components of the Juran Trilogy.  Their bottom lines will benefit, and their customers will benefit.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us