{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Trust and Verify

Third-party testing for RoHS compliance

Dennis Bradley
Tue, 04/10/2007 - 22:00
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

Europe’s Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) directive identifies six hazardous substances and their maximum permissible levels within electrical and electronic equipment. RoHS imposes upon producers of such goods responsibility for knowing whether their finished products contain these substances and whether the contents are within the regulatory limits.

The accountabilities imposed by RoHS affect the relationship and transactions between producers of electrical and electronic equipment, their suppliers and the sub-suppliers. Many suppliers have taken responsibility for applying themselves to ensuring that what they feed into the supply chain is RoHS compliant. Their customers are most often ready and willing to have the suppliers accept such responsibility and its costs. They trust their suppliers and their self-generated certificates of compliance.

Once the threats of criminal and financial consequences for noncompliance were introduced into the equation a “better safe than sorry” response became prevalent up and down the supply chain. We trust, but we must verify. The inevitable outcome was a tremendous increase in product testing.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
Top Stories
What FDA Warning Letters Reveal About Records, Spreadsheets, and AI
ISO 9001:2026 Ethics and Quality Culture
The Art of Forecasting: Part 1
Avoiding the 7 Deadly Killers of Projects
ISO 9001:2026 Is Here

Add new comment

Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us