{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Checking Off the Box

Flawed attention to compliance stands in the way of improvement

In business as in education, compliance doesn't necessarily mean understanding
Credit: Matt Miller

Barbara A. Cleary
Wed, 04/26/2017 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Complying to requirements and standards is sufficient to meet the objectives of injury and accident prevention, and ensure the health and safety of all employees—right?

ADVERTISEMENT

In his article, “We’re blinded by compliance bias,” health and safety consultant Dan Markiewicz says no, citing data indicating that only 19 percent of occupational deaths are due to injury. The rest? Diseases such as circulatory impairment and cancer, which have nothing to do with OHSA or other standards to which an organization complies. Keeping employees safe with workplace standards is not sufficient to keep them healthy.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by William A. Levinson on Wed, 04/26/2017 - 10:14

Compliance must deliver performance

Kodak's world class photographic film became obsolete while complying with ISO 9001:2000, so this is an excellent point.

This topic came up at the ISO World Conference, along with the phrase "performance based audits" (or results-based audits). The truth is that compliance and results should be synergistic. If compliance with the standard, such as ISO 9001:2015, does not deliver the desired results, closed loop improvement processes should modify the (auditable) processes so they do deliver the desired results. Then compliance with the process will deliver the intended performance, and also prevent backsliding to the previous inferior methods.

This concept actually dates back to Frederick Winslow Tayor's Scientific Management. Everybody complies with the standard for the job. If an improvement is made, the standard is changed accordingly so compliance delivers the superior results.

  • Reply

Submitted by Lean Six Sigma… on Thu, 04/27/2017 - 23:26

The Standard is only the basis

Hi and congrats for the article, I think that the standard is only on the basis for starting then a continuous improvement jurnay.

I read in the past for a new ISO for the Lean Standard , what do you think about ?

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us