{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

The Xbar & R Chart Says You’re in Control. Are you?

A statistical tool that serves as a roadmap for process improvement

Tue, 12/06/2005 - 22:00
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

The purpose of process data analysis is to answer the question, "May the observed data fluctuations reasonably be attributed to common-cause variation?" The principal use of the Shewhart control chart is to guide efforts for process improvement by assisting in the discovery of peculiarities in the data suggesting nonrandom, special-cause influence. Process data tend to wander somewhat over time, so the long-term standard-deviation estimate is greater than the short-term estimate. The time-ordered Xbar & R chart capitalizes on this by using small subgroups of data to obtain a smaller within-subgroup estimate of sigma than might otherwise have been obtained. This is accomplished by taking observations that are homogeneous (as much alike as possible). The result is that the variation within the subgroups is minimized and the variation between the subgroups is maximized, giving the tightest possible control limits and the greatest opportunity for discovering nonrandom special-cause variation.

Hence, with a single-stream process (i.e., no parallel paths such as a multiple-cavity die), a good sampling plan would be to take five consecutive pieces to make each subgroup. Subgroups should be taken at those times when expert knowledge of the process gives the greatest concern for manufacturing problems such as: 

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us