{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Six Sigma: Is It a Fad?

A few questions to consider…

Gregory Roth II
Tue, 02/14/2006 - 22:00
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

I, for one, am tired of the quality flavor of the month. It isn’t quite that bad but it seems like it at times. Have you been through statistical quality control, TQM, total quality speed, re-engineering, zero defects, quality circles, SPC, Motorola Six Sigma, AlliedSignal Six Sigma, GE Six Sigma, lean manufacturing, ISO 9000, TS 16949, DFSS, DFM and more combinations than I care to count? They seem to come fast and furious. Thomas Pyzdek calculated quality fads occur an average of roughly every four years. Have you ever wondered how fads get started and why they die?Let us start with how fads are started. Someone in a company develops a new technique to solve an existing problem and it works. This technique is used in another part of the company to solve another problem and it works. Next the word travels outside the company and other companies use it. Once this technique is tried in other companies and it works, it will continue to spread. Another fad has been born and will grow and flourish for a while. Fad is a poor choice of words, for it’s truly a quality program. I don’t want to appear to be against all quality endeavors, because I’m not. Some of these programs have changed our viewpoint forever.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
Top Stories
What FDA Warning Letters Reveal About Records, Spreadsheets, and AI
ISO 9001:2026 Ethics and Quality Culture
The Art of Forecasting: Part 1
Avoiding the 7 Deadly Killers of Projects
ISO 9001:2026 Is Here

Add new comment

Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us