{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Can Lean Co-Exist With Innovation?

Lean philosophies can liberate researchers and empower them to redouble their innovation efforts.

Knowledge at Wharton
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 14:05
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

“Lean” has come to mean an integrated, end-to-end process viewpoint that combines the concepts of waste elimination, just-in-time inventory management, built-in quality, and worker involvement supported by a cultural focus on problem solving. Can such practical principles be applied to innovation, or would lean’s structure and discipline snuff out the creative spark that underlies the birth and development of great ideas? Can lean co-exist with innovation?

ADVERTISEMENT

According to experts at The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) and the faculty of Wharton University of Pennsylvania, lean and innovation can indeed complement each other, and it’s about time they came together. Lean brings structure and predictability to innovation, and sharpens the distinction between idea generation and the development process, they say. Both share a common goal: to meet customer needs in a cost-effective manner. And lean can help empower researchers and reduce uncertainty in the innovation process itself.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Systemsthinker on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 01:11

Disagree with this OPINION

I disagree that lean does or achieves what it is claimed to achieve.

Indeed, there is little/no evidence in this article and quite the opposite a growing volume of resistance to the claims made on lean's behalf.

John Seddon's recent paper 'Rethinking Lean Service' (followed up with a podcast) seriously undermines lean's claims for transformation, suggesting the wide number of failures to sustain indicate severe flaws in the tools-based message.

I suggest that those who wish to find a different view, and a bit of balance look to The Systems Thinking Review and listen to John Seddon's podcast. Alternatively go to Itunes and download the podcasts from the systems thinking review - it is possible to get there through the navigation panel in the main screen of the review.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us