{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

The Problem-Solving Method for Lost Control

Before the tool, there was the process

Alan Nicol
Tue, 03/18/2014 - 14:05
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

Not every process or problem will produce diagnostic data that we can use statistical or other mathematical tools to address. Sometimes we feel ill-equipped when we have a problem for which our neat and sophisticated tools won’t apply. What should we do?

ADVERTISEMENT

We should remember that all our statistical, mathematical, and sophisticated modeling tools are based on basic fundamental problem-solving methods. The methods came first, and the math was developed as a means of applying the methods to numerical data. This means that even if we don’t have neatly organized numerical data, we can still apply the method. It just requires more logic and reasoning on our part, and less math.

Loss of process control is a common problem. When we have processes, typically chemical or machine processes, that rely on measurable or adjustable settings to produce measurable, quantifiable outputs, we can use control charts to monitor process control. Control charts track measurable variables and mathematically evaluate whether the results of each measurement are characteristic of normal process behavior, or if they are statistically uncharacteristic, meaning that something has changed or gone “out of control.”

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by umberto mario tunesi on Fri, 03/21/2014 - 09:29

Wisdom or Control charting?

It seems the two don't go together, <before the tool, there IS the process>. Problem solving methodologies, such as CAPA, have shown to be failures themselves: process wisdom calls for prediction, predictability but quality people want demonstration, they don't believe in facts unless they have some rule to explain them. If  we want to be wise one let's carry on, two let's doubt of any problem solving method for lost control or continual improvement.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us