{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Insecure at the Top, Part 2

One head, one process?

Umberto Tunesi
Mon, 01/20/2014 - 12:45
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

Editor’s note: Read part one here.

Both management system consultants and auditors face a dilemma when they analyze, at least technically, companies’ organizational charts. It’s not only in small or medium-size companies that managers wear more than one hat, making it difficult for auditors to trace process responsibility back to the right person.

ADVERTISEMENT

The adage “who controls the controllers?” implies that anyone responsible for his own process(es) isn’t in the best position to control his own work. But another adage implies that when subordinates have more than one boss, it’s just like having no boss at all.

Although the ISO 9001 process approach is still riding the tiger’s back and the word “risk” is taking the lion’s share of system management practices, it seems that the jungle in which these two ferocious animals dwell is still dominated by the tyrannosaurus that prevents a clear definition and implementation of any process approach under question.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
Top Stories
Beyond the Statistics: Implementing the New VDA AIAG SPC Manual
Multivariate Charts
All Whys Are Not The Same
Flying Blind: What Your Quality Data Miss Every Shift
Book Preview
The Psychology of AI Adoption at Work

Add new comment

Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us