{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

At the Expense of All Else

How an innocent decision can become a business-threatening mistake

Alan Nicol
Tue, 07/29/2014 - 09:11
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

I would never want to believe that a business, operated by intelligent and moral people, could sacrifice quality, and even ethics, to produce a product and complete a sale. Yet recently, I witnessed a business that was so desperate to make a few deadlines, it bypassed due diligence to get a product delivered.

ADVERTISEMENT

I can’t discuss the specific challenges or events I witnessed, but there are some basic behaviors that turn good and reasonable intentions into news-making, business-damaging disasters.

Imagine a project engineer submits an order for a complete product assembly, even though it’s not complete or what the engineering order (EO) process directs.

A manager explains that there is no intent to build the product from this EO, and that they only want to issue the EO to get the bill of materials into the system. Unfortunately, once the EO is issued, the process takes over, and there is nothing to prevent the manufacturing and assembly of the project as parts start to arrive.

The production floor, upon looking for drawings and documentation to begin the assembly process, can’t find instructions in the system because they are not completed and nothing prevented production from starting as intended.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by peteruly on Tue, 07/29/2014 - 10:22

Check This Out

Goo

  • Reply

Submitted by paramjit on Tue, 07/29/2014 - 17:36

Reply

Alan,

The sequence from a minor non conformance upto a disaster as spot by you is definately happening day in and day out in the industry. Untill and unless "Involvement of people" in true sence is adheared to, the solution  to problem is not possible.

Regards,

Paramjit Singh Sahni.

(paramjitsinghsahni@gmail.com)

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us