{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Cinderella Processes

Management system audit criteria must be based on risk assessment

Umberto Tunesi
Thu, 08/09/2012 - 12:59
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

We’ve all seen “Cinderella processes,” those processes that, although they do all the work in the company, are underevaluated, almost ignored by auditors.

ADVERTISEMENT

I recently conducted a survey on 20 auditors. It was intended to analyze what processes are emphasized in ISO/TS 16949 audits, as well as any nonconformances. The results were quite frustrating, considering that the ISO 9001-based quality management schemes were born during the late 1980s, some 25 years ago.

I included 20 auditors to have a reasonably representative sample, since I was reprimanded by one Quality Digest reader that one event is not significant enough. I wonder what he would think of one accident badly hurting his body; I personally consider even one event to be significant when it’s a system failure.

Let’s start with the Cinderella processes, then we’ll go through the nonconformances Hit Parade.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by gsparks on Wed, 08/15/2012 - 11:04

7.5.1.4

As an internal auditor I HAVE written a finding for 7.5.1.4 predictive maintenance.  The division of my company that was registered to TS 16949 wasn't doing any!  Their preventive maintance was excellent but predictive was nonexistant.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us