{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Wasting Time With Vague Solutions, Part 1

Helping management deal with common cause

Davis Balestracci
Fri, 09/14/2012 - 12:05
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Let’s revisit two scenarios from my July 2012 column, “The Sobering Reality of ’Beginner’s Mind.’” First, a medical center’s Harvard MBA COO insisted on nothing less than 100-percent computer uptime, no excuses. His IT department’s inability to get 100-percent uptime consistently has resulted in yet another monthly “account for results” meeting.

ADVERTISEMENT

The agenda: Get the result for the past month; show some type of table or bar graph summary (typically a red/yellow/green assessment accompanied by a variation on “this month, last month, 12 months ago”); listen to the predictable litany of excuses for why it didn’t happen the past month; and come up with the (latest) plan on how to fix it... until the next unexpected thing happens.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by pjmcdaniel3 on Thu, 09/20/2012 - 07:01

Process capability challenges

Although not a perfect solution, in the downtime example I have to wonder if sufficient reliability techniques of redundancy wouldn't save some face to demonstrate progress while new processes can be designed.  You'll suffer from COO disatisfaction of getting closer to, but not achieving 100 percent availability. But maybe get some credit for improvement. I guess I ust want to point out fault removal isn't the only way to improve -fault tolerance has a place in the toolkit.

  • Reply

Submitted by pjmcdaniel3 on Thu, 09/20/2012 - 07:01

Process capability challenges

Although not a perfect solution, in the downtime example I have to wonder if sufficient reliability techniques of redundancy wouldn't save some face to demonstrate progress while new processes can be designed.  You'll suffer from COO disatisfaction of getting closer to, but not achieving 100 percent availability. But maybe get some credit for improvement. I guess I ust want to point out fault removal isn't the only way to improve -fault tolerance has a place in the toolkit.

  • Reply

Submitted by BenOvshinsky on Fri, 09/28/2012 - 12:39

This is great reading -- very

This is great reading -- very thought-provoking. Keep up the good writing.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us