{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Five Steps to Firing a Manager With a Disengaged Workgroup

How to decide whether to let go of supervisors who are poor motivators

Gallup
Tue, 03/05/2013 - 10:23
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

ADVERTISEMENT

In my experience, if you ask senior leaders if they would fire a sales manager whose team missed quota three years in a row, they usually say yes. If you ask them if they would fire a plant manager whose facility had a poor safety record for three consecutive years, they would say yes. But ask if they would fire a manager whose workgroup had low engagement scores three years in a row, and they’re not so sure.

ADVERTISEMENT

Firing a manager for low employee engagement scores is a gray area for most leaders because they may see a number of mitigating factors. For example, a manager’s engagement scores may be lagging, but his team’s productivity and profitability numbers seem to be holding steady. Or a manager may have carried out layoffs that the company’s executive committee demanded, which could explain her team’s lower engagement levels. In some companies, the human resources department may be uncomfortable using engagement scores in a termination decision.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password
Top Stories
All Whys Are Not The Same
AI May Be Making Your Quality Problem Worse
Flying Blind: What Your Quality Data Miss Every Shift
The 6 Best Quality Management Software Features That Simplify Your QMS
Why Products Still Fail RoHS, REACH, and POPs Compliance

Comments

Submitted by umberto mario tunesi on Thu, 03/07/2013 - 20:12

Talented Managers? A gammon.

Is there anybody to - honestly - raise his, or her, hand to the above question in any Board meeting? I think that Mr. Pareto can be right here, too: some 10% managers are talented, that's all. Most managers - as the greek rock band Aphrodite's Child sung  - "teach us the hows instead of the whys". Most managers only look at bottom-line figures: it's just like what we could - and should - learn from History. The mercenaries' commanders were paid based on short-term battles' outcome, not on long-term war's overall performance. There's a basic difference between managers and leaders, that we keep confusing: leaders lead people, managers manage accounts. Thank you.  

  • Reply

Add new comment

Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us