This three-part series about strategy and its execution is based on Richard Lepsinger’s book, Closing the Execution Gap: How Great Leaders and Their Companies Get Results (Jossey-Bass/A Wiley Imprint, 2010). Part one defines the “five bridges” that companies can use to close the gap; part two describes how to build the bridges; and part three highlights successful companies that have bridged the gap.
ADVERTISEMENT |
If you read part one of this series, you're now familiar with the “five bridges” that enable a company to execute well. But how do you go about building them? First, you get comfortable with the fact that it’s a never-ending process. Then, you put certain time-tested tools and techniques in place and implement them relentlessly. The following, excerpted from Closing the Execution Gap, are some of my favorite tricks of the trade for getting these bridges underway.
Bridge No. 1: Create and use action plans
Action plans are the cornerstone of effective execution. They are the way you translate broad strategic objectives into specific, more easily monitored activities for teams and individuals. In short, they help you manage the work and bridge the gap between strategy and results. There are three steps to creating and using action plans:
Step 1: Clarify your goals and standards. This step provides direction for the work, gives you something on which to base individual action steps, and helps determine when a project is complete. A good goal statement is specific, measurable, and time bound. Here’s an example of one from an insurance company: Double the rate of organic growth to 2,000 policies a month in the personal auto line of business.
Standards are statements of quality, quantity, and timing required for success. They drive action steps and answer the question: What actions must be taken to meet these standards? A standard supporting the aforementioned “organic growth” goal statement might be “Maintain current retention ratio of 97 percent.” Another one might be “Maintain safe driver criteria and keep underwriting standards uncompromised.”
Step 2: Develop your action plan. An action plan helps you manage the workload, review, and appraise project progress, and communicate about the work to be done. Its basic components include action steps that break down the work to be done into tasks and activities, accountabilities identifying the party/parties responsible for doing each step, a schedule with start and completion dates for each action, and resource requirements such as equipment, people, money, or anything else needed to complete action steps.
Step 3: Minimize risk. You can do a bang-up job on the first two steps, but if you don’t pay attention to this one, you are likely to fail. A truly well-thought-out plan must include an assessment of the potential problems that could derail it, safeguards to stave off these “what ifs,” and the determination of what will be done if problems occur despite your best efforts.
Bridge No. 2: Expect and get top performance
You need every member of your team working at his or her full potential. The evidence is overwhelming: When we believe people are capable, we treat them like they are capable, and they come to believe they are capable. Unfortunately, the converse is true as well. This powerful dynamic starts when your expectations (high or low) are translated into behavior.
Break your own “low expectations” mindset. One way to do this is by focusing on what low performers do well. Find the process your marginal employee currently does well, no matter how small, and focus on that. Start where you and she have confidence in her ability to deliver results and move out from there. Set a modest stretch goal that is easily attainable and provide the appropriate coaching and support as she takes the risk and tries something new.
It’s also important to beware of (seemingly benign) self-esteem eroders. Even if you pride yourself on being a “straight shooter,” there is a right way and a wrong way to give feedback to your employees. Don’t say anything like, “I want you to realize that this is the second time we’ve discussed your department’s lack of productivity. I don’t intend to discuss it again.” Do say something along the lines of, “Last time we spoke, you said you felt an 8-percent increase in productivity was reasonable. However, the department is at 2 percent. What has happened since we last reviewed this issue?”
See the difference? By focusing on the problem and not the person, the manager is able to address the issue without eroding her direct report’s self-esteem. And by asking the person how he would handle the situation and involving him in determining the solution, she signals that she has confidence in his ability and uses the interaction as a coachable moment.
In addition, try to catch people doing something right. Providing recognition for a job well done has a powerful effect on people’s performance. It reinforces good work and shapes future behavior. It motivates, builds trust, and builds self-esteem and confidence. It makes people more receptive to feedback for improving performance.
When done well, recognition is more than just a “psychic hug” that makes a person feel good about herself. It’s a way of helping her understand what “good” looks like. The message is, “This is what it looks like when it’s done well, so keep on doing it.” Second, you’re saying, “You can do this.” Recognition calls the person’s attention to the fact that she has accomplished something important or made meaningful progress.
Bridge No.3: Hold people accountable
We all know accountability is important, yet many of us don’t hold others accountable for their actions. In the heat of the moment it seems faster and less of a hassle to just “let it go”—though, obviously, this approach doesn’t work in the long-term. Leaders can create an environment that enables others to operate at a higher level of responsibility. For example: 1. Clarify expectations. Here’s where you explain “what good looks like.” 2. Establish unambiguous due dates. Giving vague time frames such as “as soon as possible” and “by next week” lay the foundation for misunderstandings. (Does “by next week” mean before next week? Does it mean Monday of next week or Friday of next week?) 3. Schedule periodic check-ins. Agree to these upfront with the employee, and you won’t be viewed as a micromanager. These progress checks will be seen as a mutually endorsed activity. When an employee misses a target, ask him these three accountability questions:
1. What can you do right now to get back on track?
2. How did you contribute to this situation?
3. What can you do in the future to ensure this will not happen again? These questions allow you to help the employee solve the problem, rather than trying to pinpoint blame. They also protect his self-image and help minimize excuse making.
Bridge No. 4: Involve the right people in the right decisions
Decision making is a complex activity that uses a variety of mental processes. Many of these processes compete for dominance, and the quality of our decisions is determined by which ones win out. (For instance, your emotional processes can overrule your logical, deliberative ones.) But there are steps you can take to improve the quality of decisions made by you and your team members.
Understand what “delegate” truly means. Managers must walk a fine line between the “dump-and-run” approach to delegation and the “over-engineered” (a.k.a. “micromanaging”) approach. When you practice effective delegation, you:
• Provide enough lead time for tasks to be done right
• Share relevant facts and the big picture
• Assign jobs to people who are competent to do them
• Build confidence and competence with sincere feedback
Realize that sometimes it’s OK to be an autocrat. Other times you need to build consensus. There are three different (yet equally valid) ways of involving people in decision making: autocratic decisions, consultation decisions, and group decisions.
All three types of decisions are valid. The one you choose depends on three more factors: decision quality, decision acceptance, and the amount of time needed to make the decision. Yes, it’s complicated—which leads us to the next point:
Outsmart your brain with a systematic decision-making process. That’s right. Rather than relying on instinct or going with your gut, you should use an objective, systematic process for making decisions. This helps you avoid letting emotion or bias cloud the issues or simply defaulting to the kinds of decisions you’ve made in the past. This will also force you to incorporate risk assessment in your decision making.
Bridge No. 5: Facilitate change readiness
Execution frequently requires a change in behavior on the part of those you depend on to successfully deliver the expected results. Some of the most powerful tools and models for creating behavior change come from work being done with people trying to change addictive behaviors such as smoking, overeating, and drug abuse.
Don’t preach or lecture. Research shows that when leaders expect people to be resistant, they treat them that way. When leaders “push” too hard and “tell” people why they need to change, employees tend to react by becoming more entrenched in their own position. Consequently, leaders get the behavior they expected (without realizing that they helped cause it) and continue to push for change—which just perpetuates the situation.
Help employees “talk themselves into” wanting to change. To diminish change resistance, ask these two important questions:
1. On a scale from one to 10, how important do you think this change is?
2. On a scale from one to 10, how confident are you that you can make this change successfully?
When the other person gives you her “importance number,” instead of asking, “Why is the number not higher?” ask, “Why is the number not lower?” (“Why did you give it a six instead of a four?”) The idea is to use the person’s answer and expand on it to emphasize and reinforce her awareness of the need for change.
Reinforce “change talk.” Your instinct will be to try to convince the person that the importance number should be higher. Instead, encourage him to say more about his thoughts and feelings about the change and reinforce change-talk by:
• Pressing for specifics by asking him to elaborate
• Reinforcing the positive change statements by agreeing with the person’s insights and comments that support the change
Bridge No. 6: Enhance cooperation and collaboration
Organizations are complex structures with many interdependencies. We must rely on others to help get things done and meet our objectives, and that means cooperation and collaboration are often the key to our success. Here are a few ways to ensure the conditions that create and sustain cooperation and collaboration are in place:
Make sure they really understand what you’re saying. When you demonstrate you want to cooperate, people will usually respond in kind. But first you must be sure your communication is clear and transparent. Two simple actions—not assuming people know what you are thinking and paraphrasing to check for understanding—can go a long way toward meeting this goal.
Align interests and establish common ground. It just makes sense: When everyone is working toward the same goals and outcomes, they’re more likely to cooperate. On the other hand, when the objectives of one person or group are at odds with the objectives of another, efficiency and reliability suffer.
Picture the potential conflicts and inefficiencies that would result if one group in your unit was working toward reducing costs, while another group was focused on bringing state-of-the-art products and services to market. These objectives can coexist, but it most likely won’t happen on its own. You need to develop compatible and mutually supportive objectives in a thoughtful and explicit manner.
Avoid the following seven conflict management mistakes:
1. Minimizing or ignoring others’ concerns
2. Pulling power plays
3. Attacking the legitimacy of others’ positions or priorities
4. Suppressing differences
5. Imposing own goals/priorities
6. Refusing to temporarily remove constraints
7. Going through the motions of managing the difference, but refusing to carry it through
Once in place, cooperation is a delicate state. People will still have disagreements and different points of view about how and when things should happen. Your ability to effectively and constructively influence others, and gain their support, is critical to maintaining cooperation.
Add new comment