It’s nauseating to hear someone soft-shoe dancing around an issue because they’re afraid of hurting someone’s feelings.
|
ADVERTISEMENT |
They do so because they might receive negative feedback in a 360 review that they were abrupt or too direct in delivering feedback on that issue. So rather than going the direct route, they water down their message until it’s a mealy mouthed blathering stream of meaningless crap (yes, I’m fired up as I’m writing this).
Let me ask you this: Do you want to follow a “leader” who doesn’t speak his or her mind? Someone who’s more concerned with how their actions will be perceived rather than saying what they really think? Do you want to follow a leader who’s more interested in doing nothing wrong—and hence not doing much of anything—or would you rather follow someone who takes a stand for what they believe in and suffers the consequences as appropriate?
Me? I’ll choose Option B.
Conflict avoidance has invaded Leaderville, and it’s an ugly blight. Important: Realize that I’m not advocating or approving hateful, cruel, rude, or offensive behavior and words. Yes, some idiot won’t bother to read this sentence, and they’ll leave an anonymous comment to the effect that I’m a hate-monger or some stupidity of similar ilk. But those words and behaviors have no place in any workplace or our lives.
What I’m attacking is a belief that we as leaders can’t speak our minds because we might hurt someone’s feelings. It’s that mindset that erodes the core of leadership over time and turns it into gentle corrective actions that end up having no effect whatsoever. Sure, no one felt corrected or had their feelings hurt. But they now effectively have no freakin’ idea what they’re supposed to do or what they did wrong in the first place because the message was diluted.
We need to fix this. Now. So here’s what I propose.
1. Take the but(t) sandwich off the menu
I’ve written before about how much I hate but(t) sandwiches. Starting and ending feedback sessions with some false flattery just so you can jam a big slice of nasty feedback in the middle is a waste of time. It’s disingenuous. It also destroys your credibility as a leader. Anytime after that, if you begin praising someone they’ll simply be waiting for the “but…” even if it’s never coming. This approach to giving feedback is terrible. Stop it. Now. But(t) sandwiches are now off the menu.
2. Everyone grow up
Take your frickin’ binkies out of your mouths and put your blankies away in your Scooby Doo knapsacks. This ain’t kindergarten anymore, folks. The feedback isn’t personal. If you screwed up, step up and take it like an adult. I’ve screwed up plenty of times. And yes, when I took my beatings they were very unpleasant. But I took them and acted on them.
When you get drilled for doing something wrong, and then go crying about it to your peers, it makes you look like an idiot. They know you screwed up. They know you’re simply deflecting blame. If we spent as much time and energy focusing on fixing the mistake and building our skills to prevent the next one as we do on complaining to our co-workers about how mean our boss was to us, maybe we would actually perform better.
You make a lot of money. A lot is expected of you. Getting some pointed feedback and being mature about receiving it is in your job description. A great leadership principle states, “Seek responsibility and take responsibility for your actions.” Do it.
3. Take off the soft shoes and put on the boots
When you tiptoe around an issue, you come across as weak. More likely than not, the recipient of the feedback knows what they did (or didn’t do). They just want you to get it over with. Dancing around the issue is a waste of time. It’s confusing. The recipient might walk away confused or with the wrong impression. None of these are good things.
Whether you’re going to saddle up and be more direct or not, you’ll need to take off the soft shoes and put on the boots. If you’re going to be direct, you’ll need the boots to deliver a swift kick in the behind. If you’re still going to dance around the issue, the boots will at least protect your ankles from the piles of crap that are rising and filling the room.
4. Lead
Leading is not always a glamorous job. You’ve chosen to do it. Go be direct. Don’t deliberately hurt feelings, but for crying out loud tell people what you really think.
If you’re avoiding conflict so you can fly under the radar and continue to advance your career, you have a comeuppance in your future. At some point your lack of direct communications will be your undoing. If you simply find being direct difficult and inherently unpleasant, you might want to reconsider where you want to take your career. The higher you go, the less tolerance there is for bullcrap.
The best leaders I’ve ever met and worked for were direct. They were respectful of the individual, polite, and when needed, up in your grille with some pointed feedback. I know it made me a better performer. You’ve probably had similar experiences. Don’t you owe that same directness to your team? Shouldn’t they know exactly where they stand?
Being “nice” for the sake of avoiding conflict is dysfunctional. It will destroy your organization and your credibility in the long run. I call on each and every one of you to embrace candor and directness in the spirit of making your teams better.
I think I’ve been direct enough in this post with what’s on my mind. Now it’s your turn.
Published Jan. 21, 2026, in The thoughtLEADERS Brief on LinkedIn.

Comments
Overcoming conflict & giving good feedback
Mike, you like your feedback dished up that way and good on you. I don't like it though and I would offer some others especially women who are high on empathy and agreeableness personality wouldn't either. That delivery of feedback would invoke my amygdala (fight or flight response) which blocks the use of the brain's prefrontal cortex ( execultive functions of reason, critical thinking, problem solving etc). I was a secondary education teacher back in the day, raised a family and now work in HR in private industry & as an Exucutive Assistant. It is on leaders & coaches to educate themselves as to the 5 personality styles ( eg. Jordan Perterson personality test), interpersonal communication skills( eg. 7 habits of highly successful people- Stephen Covey) and just how to engage people so that there is trust and set up your personal interaction for success. "Start with the end in mind", as Sephen Covey says and that would be I would think that you want your staff member to hear you, understand you and be on board to change and grow. That is not happening if my brain tells me there is danger, I'm not safe and I need to protect myself and all my energy goes to that and nothing else. It is on any teacher, leader, coach, parent to start where the other person is at, fiqure out what that is and what they need, understand what boundries have been crossed on your end and then deliver your message to engage their prefrontal cortex. It's on you not them for that to happen and then it is on them to choose their response now that their emotions are regulated. That's my offering anyway and thanks for listening to the end.
Overcoming conflict & giving good feedback
Also Mike let's not mistake delivery of feedback as"nice & maybe even passive aggressive" for "kind, firm & constructive". I know there is a lot of entitlement out there and lord help us also victomhood. I wonder if that is what you are writing about. I get it because I have experienced that too with a few. I would offer that a strong employment contract, position description and performance assessment tool ( including a self-assessment as part of it) that ties into the first two, as well as a fair & effective progressive discipline policy & procedures can really help to address entitlement and victomhood or other. Be as proactive as you can to head misaligned expectations of performance ( behavior, attitude & production) between employer & employee off at the pass as it were. So in practice that is utilizing that first rung of the progressive discipline chain of having a private conversation & coaching "chat" sooner rather than later when a supervisor/manager detects a pattern emerging or other evidence of misalignment of performance expectations. Always though with the goal of skillfully continuing to build a trust relationship. A trust relationship can withstand constuctive feedback that sets up for success continuous improvement, accountability and best practice. Remember, the #1 reason that employees leave is because of their supervisor/manager and all employers want to optimize engagement and retention. What employers can control is how they lead and effective leaders have your confidence as well as strong interpersonal skills and well defined and executed company policies, procedures and practices. Look up "Athoritative Leadership" or "Stewart Leadership" as two leadership styles that I believe have what you want to deliver.
Add new comment