Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Operations Features
Susan Whitehead
Cut training time in half while reducing scrap and rework
DP Technology
Seamlessly integrates with milling center, enabling company to make full use of five-axis machining capabilities
Isaac Maw
A conversation with former Apple engineer Anna Shedletsky
Stephen McCarthy
Data-driven decisions are only as good as the data that drive them
Jim Benson
‘We see things we want to be different, but we don’t act because there are so many of them’

More Features

Operations News
A guide for practitioners and managers
Examine nine ways to help understand context, diffuse politics, heal relationships, and find the right work at the right time
Provides eight operating modes and five alarms
Making lean Six Sigma easier and adaptable to current workplaces
Deep Reality Viewer creates stereo, high-definition 3D images without using a monitor
April 25, 2019 workshop focused on hoshin kanri and critical leadership skills related to strategy deployment and A3 thinking
Makes it faster and easier to find and return tools to their proper places
Process concerns technology feasibility, commercial potential, and transition to marketplace
Identifying the 252 needs for workforce development to meet our future is a complex, wicked, and urgent problem

More News

Chad Kymal

Operations

From Percent Rejects to Parts Per Billion: Moving Toward Zero Defects

As a strategy, product or process reuse can reduce launch costs

Published: Monday, October 16, 2017 - 12:03

When Philip Crosby announced zero defects as a philosophy during the 1970s, it was met with incredulity. There were already many articles written on the fallacy of such a strategy and the enormous costs of moving toward zero defects. Fast forward 40+ years, and zero defects has become a reality.

The automotive and semiconductor/high-tech industries that we have worked with have achieved this strategy over a 30-year time period. The strategies to shift organizations that were at 20,000 to 50,000 defective parts per million (PPM) during the late 1980s to 1,000 PPM to 100 PPM and even parts per billion are now quite straightforward. Let us understand how this is done.

New-product development, defect prevention, and FMEA

Quality improvement and defect prevention start with a disciplined, new-product development process that includes phase gates. Most important, three tools are key to overall success:
1. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) that is used with design and processes
2. Design for manufacturing (DFM) and design for assembly (DFA)
3. Upfront involvement of manufacturing in design

These are not the only tools, but they are the most important that contribute to overall success. This article will focus primarily on FMEA. 

DFMEA

Our understanding of design failure mode and effect analysis (DFMEA) has grown over time. DFMEA looks at the functions of a product and its requirements and then works on the failure modes of that product. During the design phase, the causes of potential failure are focused on just design failures and not manufacturing failures. The fear is that instead of improving the design, the design team will assign all issues to manufacturing. DFMEA identifies both preventive and detective controls. Preventive controls can go into a preventive checklist, but the detective controls are linked directly to test plans.

DFMEA and test plans

At Omnex, DFMEA at the system level is called system FMEA. There is a link between system FMEA, subsystem FMEA, and component DFMEA. This link is defined by the functions and requirements of each of the design elements.

The link between DFMEA and test plans, as well as the links between DFMEAs are high-level topics only understood by best-in-class organizations. Furthermore, these links between DFMEAs and test plans are really only possible using software. See figure 1:


Figure 1: Requirements manager/flow down and risk analysis (Click here for larger image)

 

Critical and significant characteristics

The definition of critical and significant characteristics is an important part of the journey to zero defects. Both design and manufacturing need to define safety and key functional characteristics. These characteristics get defined during design, and this definition needs to populate manufacturing tools such as process flow, process failure modes and effects analysis (PFMEA), and control plans.

Process flow, PFMEA, and control plans

Figure 2 shows the links between process flow, PFMEA, control plans, and work instructions. Similar to the links between DFMEA and test plans is the link between PFMEA and control plans. An important element when doing the DFMEA and PFMEA is to look at the scrap and rework data, and ensure that the FMEAs are populated by the “things actually going wrong.”

Omnex has made dramatic improvements in company quality simply by using a methodology that we call Process Review. The Process Review is conducted by cross-functional shop-floor teams created around families of products or processes. Process flow, PFMEA, and control plans are conducted from the viewpoint of overall improvement using historical data. Most important, the updated FMEAs need to become “lessons learned” for future new-product launches.

 
Fig. 2: Links between process flow, PFMEA, control plans, and work instructions (Click here for larger image)

Disciplined problem solving—corrective action

When a product is launched, no matter how good the team is, problems or issues are going to occur both internally and at the customer. These problems are solved using a disciplined problem solving process, typically the 8D process. While the 8D methodology deserves great credit, this article focuses on the preventive nature of taking the problem, its root causes, and the corrective action, and populating both design and process FMEAs. In this way, all known problems are taken into the FMEA and used in the next product design.

Design and process reuse

This then brings us to the topics of design and process reuse. At a high level, this topic is about reusing design and processes that are known to work. What if an organization has data that shows the PPM levels of each process or product—not just the product itself, but to its functions? When product or process reuse is taken as a strategy, organizations can launch products with little to no risk. Very easily, the areas of risk can be pinpointed. In many ways, this is the next generation of the zero defects philosophy, using design and process reuse to reduce new-product launch costs.

Join me and Quality Digest’s editor in chief Dirk Dusharme on Tues. Oct. 17, 2017, for an exciting webinar: “From Percent Rejects to Parts per Billion.” Find out how the links between requirements, DFMEA, PFMEA, and the shop floors can be made using software. Also, learn how organizing the products and processes by part family and collecting PPM data while using analytics allows companies to benefit from design and process reuse. Register here.

 

Discuss

About The Author

Chad Kymal’s picture

Chad Kymal

Chad Kymal is the CTO and founder of Omnex Inc., an international consulting and training organization headquartered in the United States. He is also president of Omnex Systems, a software provider of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO 27001 management systems. He developed and teaches auditor training for ISO 9001, IATF 16949, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001, as well as an Integrated Management Systems Lead Auditor training course where all three standards are combined in a single audit.

Kymal is also on the ISO/TC 176, ISO/TC 207, and PC283 committees for ISO 9001:2015 (quality), ISO 14001:2015 (environmental), and ISO 45001 (health and safety) management system development.