{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistical Methods
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Training

How to Control Quality Risk When Motion-Control Parts Become Obsolete

The first step is to separate inconvenience from true process risk

icetray/Adobe 

Jesse Walker
Bio

Wake Industrial

Tue, 04/21/2026 - 12:02
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

In a lot of plants, motion-control equipment stays in service far longer than anyone originally expected. Servo drives, spindle amplifiers, operator panels, encoder interfaces, and power supplies often keep running for years after the OEM has shifted its attention elsewhere.

ADVERTISEMENT

That long service life is great for capital efficiency. But it creates a quality problem that many teams don’t treat as such until production is already disrupted.

When a critical motion component becomes obsolete, most people think first about downtime. That makes sense, because downtime is visible and expensive. But the bigger issue is often process drift. A line may still run after an emergency replacement, but it might no longer run the same way. Axis response can change, registration can slip, stopping distance can shift, and machine-to-machine consistency can suffer. What started as a maintenance event quickly becomes a quality event.

However, obsolescence doesn’t have to be chaotic. If quality, maintenance, and engineering teams treat legacy automation parts as controlled process risks rather than one-off purchasing headaches, they can reduce both scrap and unplanned downtime.

Here’s a practical way to do it.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.

© 2026 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us