Featured Video
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Lean Features
Harish Jose
The dangers of misapplying linearity
Trevor Blumenau
Inexpensive wireless pick-to-light systems put warehouse productivity in reach for everyone
Bonnie Stone
Five critical lean tools
Tonianne DeMaria
You can’t step in the same river twice
Jordan Kraemer
Stop doing companies’ digital busywork for free

More Features

Lean News
Management's role in improving work climate and culture
Helps manufacturers by focusing on problems and problem resolution in real time
Ask questions, exchange ideas and best practices, share product tips, discuss challenges in quality improvement initiatives
It’s time that healthcare began to learn a long-term strategic approach to transformation
Combines 3D scanner, touch probe, and software to reduce production times by 30%
Phillips Precision rounds out Inspection Arsenal quick-swap fixturing with Loc-N-Load plates
Partnership for a Cleaner Environment (PACE) program has grown to more than 40 suppliers in 40 countries
Describes how the company applied lean tools and techniques across its products, processes, and partners

More News

Kevin Meyer

Lean

A Short History of Lean

It has far deeper roots than you think

Published: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 - 12:03

To many people, lean manufacturing was invented in Japan and is synonymous with the Toyota Production System (TPS). They will tell you that the TPS is the manufacturing philosophy that enabled Toyota to effectively conquer the global automobile market by reducing waste and improving quality. While that is true, it is not the whole story. Lean has far deeper roots and broader potential.

Fundamentally, lean is about creating value and empowering people, not just eliminating waste. It was developed long before Toyota—long before the 20th century, in fact. Some trace the roots of lean all the way back to the Venice Arsenal during the 1500s, when Venetian shipbuilders could roll complete galley ships off the production line every hour, a remarkable achievement enabled by several weeks of assembly time being sequenced into a continuous, standardized flow. (The genius that helped the military engineers at the Venice Arsenal was none other than Galileo himself—perhaps the first-ever lean consultant!)


Venetian ship from the 1500s

By 1760, the French were using standardized designs and the interchangeability of parts to facilitate repairs on the battlefield. Eli Whitney refined the concept to build 10,000 muskets for the U.S. government at previously unheard of low prices. Militaries around the world fine-tuned continuous flow and standardized processes throughout the 1800s. Over time, standardization slowly entered into commercial manufacturing.

In 1910, Henry Ford moved his nascent automobile manufacturing operations into Highland Park, Michigan, which is often called the “birthplace of lean manufacturing.” Ford used continuous flow and standardized processes, coupled with innovative machining practices to enable highly consistent, repetitive assembly. Ford often cited the frugality of Benjamin Franklin as an influence on his own business practices—especially Franklin’s advice that avoiding unnecessary costs can be more profitable than increasing sales.

Ford was able to reduce core chassis assembly time from 12 hours to less than three. This reduced the cost of a vehicle to the point where it became affordable to the masses and created the demand that helped build Ford’s River Rouge plant, which became the world’s largest assembly operation with more than 100,000 employees. In 1911, Sakichi Toyoda (father of Kiichiro Toyoda, the founder of Toyota Motor Co.) visited the United States and witnessed Ford’s Model T production line. He returned to Japan to apply what he saw on his company’s handloom weaving machines.

As Ford and Toyoda were streamlining their operations, others were making parallel improvements in the quality and human arenas of manufacturing. In 1906, the Italian Vilfredo Pareto noticed that 80 percent of the wealth was in the hands of 20 percent of the population, a ratio he found could be applied to areas beyond economics. Joseph M. Juran took the Pareto principle and turned it into a quality control tool that focused on finding and eliminating the most important defects. A few years later, Walter Shewhart invented the control chart, which allowed managers to monitor process variables. Shewhart went on to develop the plan-do-study-act improvement cycle, which W. Edwards Deming then altered to create the plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle still in use today.

During the early years of the 20th century, efficiency expert Frank Gilbreth advanced the science of management by observing construction and factory workers. He and his wife, Lillian, started a consulting company to teach companies how to be more efficient by reducing human motion during assembly processes. Sakichi Toyoda, having already benefited from Henry Ford’s ideas, became an expert at reducing human-induced variability in his factories.

Then came World War II. At the beginning of the war, Consolidated Aircraft in San Diego was able to build one B-24 bomber per day. Ford’s Charles Sorensen thought he could improve that rate, and as a result of his efforts, a couple years later the Willow Run plant was able to complete one B-24 per hour.

With almost all of the traditional male factory workforce deployed overseas for the war, the human aspect of manufacturing moved front and center. Training Within Industry was born as a method to rapidly and effectively train women to work in the wartime factories. After the war, Training Within Industry found its way to Japan even as it faded away in the United States (only recently has it returned).

The end of the war saw a divergence in philosophies between the two countries. In the United States, Ford adopted the General Motors style of top-down, command-and-control management and effectively abandoned lean manufacturing. Meanwhile in Japan, Toyota led the acceleration of the development and implementation of lean methods. The company transitioned from a conglomerate that still included the original loom business to a company focused on the auto market. Taiichi Ohno was promoted to machine shop manager and under his watch, Toyota developed the concepts of elimination of waste and creation of value. The human side of manufacturing was especially important to Ohno, who transferred increasing amounts of authority and control directly to workers on the shop floor.


Toyota president, Fukio Nakagawa, and Edwards W. Deming, 1965: Toyota Motor Co. wins the Deming Prize

After being sent to Japan in 1946 and 1947 by the U.S. War Department to help study agriculture and nutrition, Deming returned to Japan in the early 1950s to give a series of lectures on statistical quality control, demonstrating that improving quality can reduce cost. Toyota embraced these concepts and embedded them into the Toyota Production System (TPS), leading to Toyota Motor Co. winning the Deming Prize for Quality in 1965. Over several years, Taichi Ohno and Shigeo Shingo continued to refine and improve TPS with the development of pull systems, kanban, and quick changeover methods.

By the early 1970s, the rest of the world was beginning to notice Japan’s success, and managers assembled for the first study missions to Japan to see the TPS in action. Norman Bodek and Robert Hall published some of the first books in English describing aspects of the TPS, and by the mid-1980s, several U.S. companies, notably Danaher, HON, and Jake Brake, were actively trying the “new” concepts.

The term “lean” was first coined by John Krafcik in his MIT master’s thesis on Toyota, and then popularized in two books by James P. Womach and Daniel T. Jones that spread a wider knowledge of the TPS: The Machine That Changed the World, co-authored by Daniel Roos (Free Press, 1990), and Lean Thinking (Simon & Schuster, 1996).

In Lean Thinking the core attributes of lean are described as:
• Specify value from the perspective of the customer.
• Define the value stream for a product, then analyze the steps in that stream to determine which are waste and which add value.
• Establish continuous flow of products from one operation to the next.
• Create pull between process steps to produce the exact amount of products required (i.e., make to order).
• Drive toward perfection, both in terms of quality and eliminating waste.

By the year 2000, lean methods were moving beyond manufacturing and into office and administrative environments. The spread of lean continues today, and currently, lean healthcare, lean government, lean information technology (and Agile software development), and lean construction are particularly popular.

This article is an excerpt from The Simple Leader: Personal and Professional Leadership at the Nexus of Lean and Zen (Gemba Academy LLC, 2016).

Discuss

About The Author

Kevin Meyer’s picture

Kevin Meyer

Kevin Meyer has more than 25 years of executive leadership experience, primarily in the medical device industry, and has been active in lean manufacturing for more than 20 years serving as director and manager in operations and advanced engineering, and as CEO of a medical device manufacturing company. He consults and speaks at lean events; operates the online knowledgebase, Lean CEO, and the lean training portal, Lean Presentations; and is a partner in GembaAcademy.com, which provides lean training to more than 5,000 companies. Meyer is co-author of Evolving Excellence–Thoughts on Lean Enterprise Leadership (iUniverse Inc., 2007) and writes weekly on a blog of the same name.

Comments

Shewhart and Deming

Kevin,

As usual, another good read from you. This time I would challenge three points:

1. As per Moen and Norman (Quality Progress, November 2010, p. 27) Deming wrote to Moen in 1990 stating on the subject of the Shewhart cycle “Be sure to call it PDSA, not the corruption PDCA,”, and in 1991 "How the PDCA ever came into existence I know not."  – My understanding is that Deming did not alter the PDSA to bring about PDCA. I understood that Deming was not at all a fan of “check”, rather much preferring “study” to emphasise the learning part of the cycle.

2. Your paper suggests Juran and the Pareto chart came before Shewhart’s control chart, yet when Shewhart invented the control chart, in 1924, Juran was just 20.  According to Wikipedia (so right or wrong I don’t know) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_M._Juran#Pareto_principle “In 1941, Juran stumbled across the work of Vilfredo Pareto and began to apply the Pareto principle to quality issues…”

3. I’d also argue that Shewhart invented the control chart as a method to get the most out of a process, moreover to be most useful shouldn't those working on the process be the main users of the method (even though management contribution is essential)?

A Short History of Lean

Hey Kevin,

Just want to say that this article is well done... nice work!