{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

How to Lose a War Before It Starts

We can’t allow our manufacturing capability to atrophy

William A. Levinson
Wed, 03/27/2024 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

What do quality and productivity have to do with World War III, which we all hope will never happen? The answer is everything. A massive loss of American manufacturing capability between 1945 and 2024 has conceded enormous advantages to aggressor nations that might be inclined to break the peace.

ADVERTISEMENT

Quality and efficiency principles began to convey decisive advantages to American manufacturers roughly 120 years ago, during the era of Henry Ford, Frederick Winslow Taylor, Harrington Emerson, and Frank Gilbreth. We must use these principles as widely as possible to rebuild the manufacturing base we would need to win a major conflict.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Jonathon (not verified) on Wed, 03/27/2024 - 09:45

Missed Opportunities

We had numerous opportunities to respond to this, many of which were wiped out by political opportunism. It's on record that Obama proposed measures to incentivize firms to "re-shore" capacity - and that the opposing political party made sure it never reached the floor for so much as a discussion. They prioritized "scoring political points" over doing the right thing. And that's just one example of a certain party inflicting harm upon the entire nation just to serve their short term power grabs.

  • Reply

Submitted by Don Grimley (not verified) on Wed, 03/27/2024 - 10:26

Workers

I concur that the organizations you listed in your fantastic piece must be included, but we also need to involve the educational system. I don't mean the big universities and colleges; rather, I mean the smaller, more established trade institutions. Massive capability growth is impossible without skilled workers to staff the assembly line workstations and machinery. We ought to examine some of our NATO allies' educational systems, like Germany's. Not every individual is suited for college. Our industrial base programs ought to include apprenticeship programs, trade schools, and community colleges.

  • Reply

Submitted by William A. Levinson on Wed, 03/27/2024 - 15:52

In reply to Workers by Don Grimley (not verified)

Trades are vital

When I went to high school, I and others labored under the impression that "shop" and "vocational technical" courses were for students who could not handle the advanced placement courses that my friends and I took. I earned a year of college credit for those but now I wish I had taken shop and/or vo-tech because I think they would have made me a better engineer. I learned later that the Henry Ford Trade School combined hands-on shop work with classroom instruction, and the graduates earned higher wages than most college graduates at the time when not many people went to college. (Even Ford himself never finished high school although, when I first read his book, I thought he had a degree in chemical engineering due to discussions of absorption and recovery of solvents.)

I did learn enough (on my own) to change an electrical socket without electrocuting myself, and replace a garbage disposal, but I have also watched plumbers work in my house and I realize that they could have done the latter job in perhaps a quarter of the time. I just paid one $100 an hour for a job I was reluctant to handle by myself. The trades need a lot more attention and respect.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us