{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Lessons in Respectful and Effective Workplace Signage

From commands to collaboration

Sure, the message is clear. But does your signage have the right tone? Photo by Adam Birkett on Unsplash

Mark Graban
Wed, 08/14/2024 - 12:01
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

In the world of continuous improvement and lean management, clear and respectful communication is crucial.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s take a moment to examine two different approaches to communicating a simple instruction regarding the operation of a centrifuge, as seen in the images below—pictures I took in a hospital laboratory where I was working 15 years ago or so.

On the left (below), we have a handwritten sign that I discovered one day that reads, “DO NOT CHANGE SPIN TIME. Should be 6 Min.” It’s a direct command that leaves little room for understanding or buy-in from the team. While the intent is clear, the tone can be perceived as authoritarian and dismissive, which might not resonate well with employees. This approach assumes that the instruction is enough without providing context or reasons.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by John (not verified) on Wed, 08/14/2024 - 09:24

Are you kidding me? Should…

Are you kidding me? Should we change stop signs to pink? What a ridiculous article! Why don't we just eliminate signs and let people decide what they want to do so we aren't being "authoritative" at all? Please, write about subjects that matter.

  • Reply

Submitted by William A. Levinson on Wed, 08/14/2024 - 11:01

This is a good approach

This looks consistent with the job breakdown sheet, where the reason for each step of the job is provided.

For example, "Goggles must be worn" should be accompanied by the description of whatever hazard is present because it might not be obvious.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us