{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

        
User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistics
    • Resource Management
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • Regulated Industries
    • Research & Tech
    • Quality Improvement Tools
    • People Management
    • Metrology
    • Manufacturing
    • Roadshow
    • QMS & Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Resource Management
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Training

The Quality Profession: A Noble Calling

One expert’s thoughts on how quality has evolved, adapted, and stayed the same

Carlos N. Cuatzo Meza / Unsplash

David Schwinn
Bio

Lansing Community College

Mon, 11/24/2025 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

I’ve been in and around the quality profession for decades. When I first started, we were most concerned about products failing in our customers’ hands... too often and too soon. I worked at General Motors in those days, in the Frigidaire division when Frigidaire was part of General Motors. We made major home appliances and parts for automotive air-conditioning systems.

ADVERTISEMENT

I was fortunate to simultaneously see two very separate industries at the same time. In both industries our quality was generally as good as anyone else’s. Our customers liked our quality, but not enough to influence the choice of what products they bought. Our jobs in those days as quality professionals were to try to improve quality without increasing cost, at a time when everyone absolutely believed that improving quality meant increasing cost. That was about to change.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Dr. Susan O. Schall (not verified) on Mon, 11/24/2025 - 09:19

Quality Noble Profession

Thanks for clarifying that cost differential was not due to automation.  Leaders and engineers too often fall into the technology trap when quality which not only addresses root causes of problems leading to high costs, but respects people in the process will reduce costs AND improve customer AND employee satisfaction .... a real win-win for all!

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us