{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Use a Variable-Height Desk to Improve Productivity and Health

Flexible workstations can be created for less than $300

Standing desks may offer some interesting health benefits
William A. Levinson
Mon, 02/27/2017 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

‘Sitting is the new smoking” is a common new adage. James Levin, M.D., of the Mayo Clinic explains, “Too much sitting also seems to increase the risk of death from cardiovascular disease and cancer.” He adds that sitting for four rather than two hours a day in front of a TV screen increases the chance of death from all causes by 50 percent, and similar problems apply to sitting at a desk or in a car.

ADVERTISEMENT

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Alan Metzel on Mon, 02/27/2017 - 09:12

Statistical Voodoo

"...sitting for four rather than two hours a day ...increases the chance of death from all causes by 50 percent"

I don't really know where to start with this but lets begin with the, hopefully undisputed, premise that the chances of dying from all causes is 100%. Further, I hope we can all agree that a 150% chance of anything is a meaningless number. Hence the claim as written is likewise meaningless.

If the intent was to indicate that there is a corelation between sitting and life expectancy, then those numbers, which I would have to assume are available, should be the stated relation.

  • Reply

Submitted by William A. Levinson on Mon, 02/27/2017 - 10:43

In reply to Statistical Voodoo by Alan Metzel

Increased risk

The reference explains,

One study compared adults who spent less than two hours a day in front of the TV or other screen-based entertainment with those who logged more than four hours a day of recreational screen time. Those with greater screen time had:

  • A nearly 50 percent increased risk of death from any cause
  • About a 125 percent increased risk of events associated with cardiovascular disease, such as chest pain (angina) or heart attack

I think what he means is that, if your risk of chest pain or heart attack would normally be 10%, your risk would be 22.5% (125% more) due to sitting. 225% means multiplication by 2.25

I am by the way up to about 6 hours a day, and I feel a lot healthier!

  • Reply

Submitted by Alan Metzel on Mon, 02/27/2017 - 13:47

In reply to Increased risk by William A. Levinson

????

Sorry, I can't get past the absolute that I have a 100% chance of dying. When that time arrives I will, with 100% certainty, have died from some cause. Now, if I take any possible cause of death, let us call its statistical probability "p".  It follows that the probability of dying from any other cause must be 100-p. If I increase the probability by 50%, that probability becomes 1.5p and the probability of dying from another cause becomes 100-1.5p. Obviously, if I repeat this exercise for another cause, the remainder will again decrement. Also obvious is the fact that while it is possible that individual causes may become more frequent, it can only be by the reduction of one or more others. Hence, any claim increasing the probability of all causes must be a statistical oxymoron.

  • Reply

Submitted by William A. Levinson on Mon, 02/27/2017 - 13:53

In reply to ???? by Alan Metzel

Think of it as a reliability exercise

It's like having a part that will certainly fail after a certain number of cycles or time in service. However, if you increase the hazard rate, it is more likely that it will fail sooner. Certain behaviors like smoking, and now apparently sitting all day, increase the hazard rate for various illnesses and can therefore be expected to decrease our life expectancy.

  • Reply

Submitted by Alan Metzel on Mon, 02/27/2017 - 14:17

In reply to Think of it as a reliability exercise by William A. Levinson

Exactly!

My point exactly, its not how, or why, it is when....

  • Reply

Submitted by Jeff Dewar on Mon, 02/27/2017 - 10:56

Another option

Great article Bill! Here's my version of your recommendation: https://cl.ly/3c3e0b3V0l35 I like the up / down throughout the day, and with this setup it takes only 20 seconds to switch (the monitor is on a stand that I can raise / lower with a couple of fingers). I like the look of a more traditional desk when I want to have a sit-down meeting. This is a great article for Quality Digest. If comfort, physical energy, and ease of work are not part of the quality and productivity game, then I don't know what is! Best, Jeff
  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us